(1)
POOJA @ GURINDER KAUR KAINTH AND ANOTHER …PETITIONERS Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS D.D
01/06/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Procedure Code – Registration of FIR – Non-compliance with Sections 154(1) and 154(3) Cr.P.C. – Application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed without first approaching police authorities and without supporting affidavits – Held, application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is maintainable only after following the procedure under Sections 154(1) and 154(3) Cr.P.C. &nda...
(2)
Ajith Kumar V.S. and Ors. - Petitioners Vs.
State Of Kerala and Ors. - Respondents D.D
31/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Service conditions of officers and servants of High Court – Primacy of Chief Justice – Enhancement of retirement age – Proposal to enhance retirement age from 56 to 58 years – Committee recommendation for enhancement of retirement age for meritorious employees – Government’s rejection citing parity with government servants’ retirement age – Jurisdict...
(3)
Ankit Jatav S/o Shyamkumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Bhainsa, P.s.- Mawana, District Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. ----Petitioner Vs.
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Purshottam Kumar S/o Bherulal, R/o Lal Bai Mohalla, Mangrol, District Baran, Rajasthan. ....Respondents D.D
31/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Quashing of FIR – Petition filed for quashing FIR No. 129/2021 registered under Section 363 of IPC – Cognizance taken under Sections 366, 376, 376(2)(n), Section 5(1)(j)(ii), and Section 6 of The POCSO Act – Petitioner and victim married and have a child – Victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. stating marriage and consensual physical relationship &n...
(4)
BANDANA KUMARI AND OTHERS .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
31/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Review Petition - Maintainability - Parties - Impleadment of parties - Whether the review petitioners were necessary parties before the writ court or the appellate court - Validity of office communication challenged in writ petitions - No challenge to seniority list or rights of specific incumbents - Private persons voluntarily impleaded themselves as respondents - Sufficient representation - Revi...
(5)
Rameshwar Lal Chauhan ...PETITIONER Vs.
State of U.P. ...RESPODENT D.D
31/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) - Examination of the accused - Circumstances not put to the accused during examination under Section 313 - Exclusion from consideration - Principles of natural justice - Opportunity to explain incriminating material - Judgments referred to in support - Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra and Sujit Biswas Vs. State of Assam - Accuse...
(6)
MANISH SISODIA ..... Petitioner Vs.
CENTRAL BUERAEU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent D.D
30/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Bail in Economic Offenses - Factors to consider - Seriousness of allegations, evidence, severity of punishment, character of accused, possibility of tampering with witnesses, larger interests of public/state - Different approach for economic offenses - Bail to be granted judiciously within four corners of law - Discretion not to be influenced by arbitrariness - Need...
(7)
VIPUL PRAKASH PATIL, ...PETITIONER Vs.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA ...RESPODENT D.D
30/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Prima facie material required to connect accused with alleged crime - Abuse of process of law - Right to personal liberty - Constitution of India, Article 21. [Para 18]
2. Registration of case under Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2004 - Preliminary satisfaction report not submitted - Prima facie material required - Abuse of process of co...
(8)
M/s Bassiarkh Rice Mills and another - Petitioners Vs.
Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and others - Respondents D.D
29/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 51 - Execution of decree - Transfer of ownership of attached property - Erroneous process followed by Executing Court - Decree holder seeking transfer and sale of attached property in their name - No participation of decree holder in auction proceedings - No provision for direct transfer of ownership - Impugned order set aside - Case remanded to Executing Co...
(9)
Rinku Ram - Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana - Respondent D.D
29/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Bail - Recovery from co-accused - Disclosure statement - No recovery from the petitioner - Petitioner's name emerging from disclosure statement - Petitioner in custody for a significant period - No comment on merits of the case - Petitioner granted bail. [Para 5]
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Bail - No...