(1)
RAM LAL AND OTHERS …APPELLANTS Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB …RESPONDENT D.D
22/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law – Appeal against Conviction – Delay in FIR – Valid reasons for delay in reporting matter to police recorded by Trial Court – Injuries to complainant and parents established by medico-legal reports – Conviction upheld – Appellants ordered to undergo probation for one year due to the long duration of trial. [Para 11-13]
Minor Injuries to ...
(2)
Gurmeet Singh - Petitioners Vs.
State of Punjab and Others - Respondents D.D
19/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Interpretation of Statutes - Rules of interpretation - Application to Section 17-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - The statute must be read as a whole and each word used by the legislature is required to be assigned a meaning to give a meaningful definition - Words in a statute are used precisely and not loosely - Intention of the legislation predominates while interpreting the statute...
(3)
MAINA CHAWLA AND ANOTHER …APPELLANTS Vs.
KULDEEP AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS D.D
19/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Motor Vehicles Act – Claim Petition – Standard of Proof – Claim petition dismissed by Tribunal holding rash and negligent driving not proved – Death of deceased in accident fully established by evidence – Strict rules of evidence and standard of proof under CrPC not applicable to claim proceedings – Tribunal's dismissal on negligence grounds erroneous &ndash...
(4)
SUKHWINDER SINGH CHEEMA …PETITIONER Vs.
ANU BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS D.D
18/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Civil Procedure – Unsoundness of Mind – Order XXXII Rule 15 CPC – Petition to take plaint off the record on grounds of plaintiff's alleged unsoundness of mind – Court held that before taking the plaint off the record, there must be a pre-existing adjudication or declaration by a Court regarding the unsoundness of mind of the plaintiff – Petition dismissed with cos...
(5)
Anchal Kumar Paswan & others - Petitioners Vs.
Union of India & others - Respondents D.D
17/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
relief must come with clean hands – Petitioners had no title or right to the land they Discretionary relief – Clean hands doctrine – A person seeking discretionary occupied – Court cannot protect or advance an illegality – Petitioners were rank trespassers over government land. [Para 4]
Adverse possession – Applicability – Adverse poss...
(6)
Abid Ali ...Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and others …Respondents D.D
17/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Scheduled Castes (SC) Certificate - Validity - Petitioner, belonging to Muslim community, obtained an SC certificate and secured appointment as a Lecturer under the Self-Financing Scheme (SFS) - Respondent-University initiated disciplinary proceedings and dismissed the petitioner on the ground that he obtained the appointment on the basis of a forged caste certificate - Court examined whether the ...
(7)
Rajdeep Singh - Petitioner Vs.
State of Punjab - Respondent D.D
17/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law - Bail - Regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Grant of - Petitioner arrested in a case registered under Sections 22/61/85 of the NDPS Act, 1985 - Petitioner alleged to be transporting contraband substance - Petitioner's counsel contended that the bottles were being transported between licensed seller and purchaser with valid documentation - Petitioner a first-time offender and...
(8)
Ravindra Pratap Yadav .....Appellant Vs.
Smt. Asha Devi And Others .....Respondents D.D
16/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13 - Divorce - Mental cruelty - Appeal against dismissal of divorce petition - Appellant alleged mental cruelty, long desertion, and a divorce agreement reached in a community Panchayat - Lower court dismissed the case citing lack of admissible evidence - High Court held that denying sexual intercourse without sufficient reason amounts to mental cruelty - Uncontr...
(9)
BHUPENDER SINGH …PETITIONER Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS D.D
16/05/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law – Quashing of FIR – Heinous Offences – Petition to quash FIR for rape under Section 376(2)(n) IPC on the basis of compromise between the parties – Prosecutrix claimed allegations were made in a fit of anger – Court held that FIRs involving serious offences like rape cannot be quashed even if a compromise is reached – Petition dismissed. [Para 12-13]...