Employment Law – Transfer and Posting – Appeal against order favoring employee’s writ petition challenging compulsory retirement due to unauthorized absence – Employer's prerogative to decide employee's place of work emphasized – Health issues and political influence in transfer orders considered – Court upholds employer's decision, reinstates punishment of compulsory retirement [Paras 1-8].

Absenteeism and Misconduct – Employee claimed health issues as reason for absenteeism – Medical report did not support health-related leave – Unauthorized absence deemed misconduct – Supreme Court precedents affirm disciplinary action for such absence [Paras 5-7].

Political Influence in Service Matters – Court criticized political interference in employee transfers and postings – Noted it disrupts public administration – Court disapproved employee’s act of seeking political influence, affecting writ relief eligibility [Para 7].

Judicial Review of Disciplinary Actions – Findings of guilt in disciplinary proceedings generally upheld – Limited judicial interference, especially when departmental appeals fail on merits – Court supports employer’s disciplinary decisions unless exceptions apply [Para 8].

Decision:

Appeal allowed – Order of the learned Single Judge set aside – Compulsory retirement of the respondent-employee reinstated – Benefits accruing from compulsory retirement to be processed within eight weeks, with interest for delays.

Habeas Corpus – Right to Autonomy – Petitioner parents sought custody of their adult daughter (Ms. X), claiming psychological issues and illegal detention by the 5^th respondent – High Court, after interaction, found Ms. X to be of sound mind, having made an informed choice to live with her partner – Petition dismissed, respecting the right to autonomy and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution [Paras 1-13].

LGBTQ+ Rights – Familial Rejection – High Court emphasized the significance of recognizing chosen families for LGBTQ+ individuals, highlighting the potential violence and lack of safety from natal families – Court upheld Ms. X’s right to live with her chosen partner, rejecting assumptions based on erroneous psychological assessments [Paras 7-10].

Right to Privacy – Constitutional Protection – Reinforced that sexual orientation is integral to personal identity and privacy – Cited Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, affirming that decisional autonomy is a core part of the right to privacy under Articles 14, 15, and 21 [Paras 10-11].

Directive for Document Handover – Petitioners directed to submit Ms. X’s educational certificates and personal IDs to the police for safe transfer to her, ensuring her ability to seek employment and independence – Emphasized no threats or violence to be allowed against Ms. X [Paras 12-13].

Decision:

Writ Petition dismissed – Petitioners directed to hand over all personal documents of Ms. X to the police – High Court reiterated the importance of acceptance and support from families towards LGBTQ+ individuals.

Criminal Law – Formation of Unlawful Assembly – Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 148, and 324 read with Section 149 IPC upheld – Appellants’ involvement in group violence following a football match – Evidence established presence and participation in the unlawful assembly [Paras 1-13, 16].

Criminal Law – Culpable Homicide not Amounting to Murder – Conviction under Section 302 IPC modified to Section 304 Part I IPC for accused 1 to 3 – Evidence showed that the accused inflicted head injuries likely to cause death – No premeditated intention to kill established – Appellants already served more than 7½ years [Paras 9, 17-19, 22].

Witness Testimony – Identification and Credibility – Multiple witnesses identified the appellants – Witnesses’ injuries corroborated by medical records – Arguments challenging credibility dismissed due to corroborative evidence and procedural correctness in witness examination [Paras 8, 10-11, 15-16].

Evidence – Omission and Contradiction – Arguments on omissions in witness statements rejected – Omission not brought up during cross-examination under Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act not treated as material contradiction [Para 15].

Conspiracy – Insufficient Evidence – Conviction under Section 120B IPC set aside – No evidence of premeditated agreement to commit murder – Incident considered as a spontaneous clash rather than a planned conspiracy [Paras 17-18, 22].

Decision – Appeal Partly Allowed – Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 148, and 324 read with Section 149 IPC upheld for all appellants – Conviction under Sections 302 and 120B read with Section 149 IPC set aside for accused 5, 6, 8, 11, and 12 – Conviction for accused 1 to 3 modified to Section 304 Part I IPC – Appellants’ imprisonment already served considered sufficient – Release ordered if no other cases pending [Paras 22-24].
 

Criminal Law – Rape and Cheating – Appellant convicted for rape under the pretext of false promise of marriage – Trial court’s judgment affirmed by High Court – Appellant argued that the prosecutrix knew he was married and that her consent was not obtained under misconception – High Court emphasized the absence of evidence proving misconception or coercion [Paras 1-14].

Consent under Section 90 IPC – Misconception of Fact – Court highlighted that prosecutrix knew about appellant’s marital status – Consent given by prosecutrix for sexual intercourse not influenced by a promise of marriage – Section 90 not applicable [Paras 33-48].

Evidentiary Standards – Witness Testimony – Court examined contradictions and interpolations in testimonies of P.W.1 and other prosecution witnesses – Noted discrepancies undermining reliability of evidence – Medical examination showed no signs of force or violence [Paras 37-47, 62-64].

Delay in Lodging Complaint – Explained in Context – Court acknowledged cultural and social hesitation in reporting sexual offences – Delay of five days in lodging FIR considered reasonable in context – However, investigation deemed shoddy and delayed without reasonable cause [Paras 66-74].

Decision: Appeal allowed – Conviction and sentence set aside – Appellant acquitted of all charges – Bail bonds cancelled [Paras 74-74].

Contempt of Court – Willful Disobedience – Petitioners sought to punish respondents for disobeying orders of the Division Bench of the High Court – Respondents claimed good faith, misunderstanding the status of interim order – Court accepted unconditional apologies considering no further actions were taken post-execution petition – Contempt case closed with direction to respondents to halt further proceedings in E.P.12/2022 [Paras 1-8].

Execution of Compromise Decree – Lok Adalat Award – Compromise reached and award passed by Lok Adalat required execution of sale deed – Respondent filed execution petition post interim stay order, misunderstanding it was vacated – Court emphasized the duty to verify the status of interim orders before proceeding [Paras 2-4].

Apology and Undertaking – Respondent’s Conditional Compliance – Respondent tendered unconditional apology and submitted undertaking to cease further actions in execution proceedings till disposal of main writ petition – Court accepted apology but highlighted the importance of verifying court orders [Paras 6-7].

Decision – Contempt Case Closed – Held – Apologies accepted and directions given to halt proceedings in E.P.12/2022 – No costs awarded – Interlocutory applications, if any, to stand closed [Para 8].

Negotiable Instruments Act – Dishonour of Cheques – Petitioner issued cheques to the respondent which were dishonoured due to insufficient funds – Legal proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act initiated – Settlement agreement reached, but petitioner failed to comply fully – Respondent invoked Section 421 of the Cr.P.C. for enforcement – Court upheld the enforcement of settlement terms [Paras 1-10].

Settlement Agreement – Non-compliance – Settlement under Section 147 of the NI Act – Petitioner failed to pay agreed amount – Court confirmed liberty for respondent to recover amount through Section 421 of Cr.P.C. – Emphasized that settlement subsumes original complaint and failure leads to fresh cause of action [Paras 6-8].

Jurisdiction and Legal Principles – Apex Court’s observations on settlement agreements and subsequent liabilities – Reference to cases Gimpex Private Limited v. Manoj Goel, Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels, Himanshu v. B. Shivamurthy – Court noted principles but found them inapplicable to petitioner’s arguments [Paras 8-9].

Decision – Criminal Petition Rejected – Interim order dissolved – Emphasized enforcement of settlements and no merit in technical objections by petitioner [Para 10].

Provident Fund Contributions – Liability of Amalgamated Entity –

Petitioner bank challenged the order imposing damages and interest for delayed remittance of Provident Fund contributions and transfer of past accumulations by the Board of Trustees (BOT) of the amalgamated bank – Contention that BOT is a separate entity and petitioner should not be held liable – High Court held that obligations of the amalgamated bank include liabilities of the BOT – Sections 17(1-A) and 27AA of the Scheme mandate employer responsibility for timely transfer of funds [Paras 1-21].

Constitutional Validity – Section 14B of EPF Act –

Petitioner argued Section 14B inconsistent with Section 17(1-A)(d)(iv) of EPF Act and Article 14 of the Constitution – Court found no inconsistency or arbitrariness – Upheld validity of Section 14B, emphasizing statutory obligations of employer for Provident Fund contributions – Reference to precedents indicating employer liability for BOT actions [Paras 22-25].

Decision:

Writ petition dismissed – Court affirmed that petitioner bank is liable for damages and interest imposed by Provident Fund Authority – Section 14B held valid and consistent with statutory provisions and constitutional principles – No arbitrariness found in the authority’s order [Paras 26-28].

Bank Accounts – Defreezing – Appeal against the order to defreeze the accounts of CSI West Bengal Branch – Single Judge directed the bank to defreeze accounts and allowed suspended office bearer to operate them – Division Bench upheld defreezing but restricted suspended office bearer’s operation – Allowed West Bengal Branch to nominate new signatories from non-suspended office bearers [Paras 1-36].

Society Administration – Suspension of Office Bearers – Suspension of office bearers for violating injunction orders – Court refrained from deciding on suspension legality within appeal scope – Emphasized branches’ financial autonomy with certain oversight by parent body [Paras 18, 26-30].

Banking Operations – Freezing Orders – Banks can only freeze accounts under specific circumstances such as court orders, Central Bank instructions, or legitimate claims against the account holder – Action based on complaints without legal backing deemed improper [Paras 20-22].

Decision – Appeal Partly Allowed – Upheld order to defreeze accounts but set aside order permitting suspended office bearers to operate them – Allowed temporary operation by suspended officer under strict conditions until new signatories are nominated [Paras 35-36].

Pension and Gratuity – Withholding of Retirement Benefits – Rule 43(b) and 43(c) of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 – Petitioner retired without any pending departmental or criminal proceedings – Withholding 10% of pension and gratuity deemed illegal in absence of such proceedings – Writ petition allowed directing respondents to pay withheld amounts [Paras 2-19].

Procedural Fairness – Requirement of Pending Proceedings – Rule 43(b) and 43(c) stipulate withholding only if proceedings are pending – Respondents failed to show any ongoing departmental proceedings – Court emphasizes strict adherence to procedural fairness in withholding pension and gratuity [Paras 13-16].

Decision:n Writ petition allowed – Respondents directed to pay the petitioner the remaining 10% of pension and gratuity along with arrears forthwith.