(1)
SRI H R SHESHADRI …PETITIONER Vs.
SRI U V NATARAJ …RESPONDENT D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Dishonored Cheque and Conviction Challenge - Accused petitioner appeals against conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and confirmed by the Sessions Court for offense under Section 138 of the N.I Act - Accused contends cheque was not issued for legally enforceable debt and challenges the signature's authenticity on the cheque - Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. [P...
(2)
MR K GANGAPPA …PETITIONER Vs.
MR M VISHWANATHA REDDY …RESPONDENT D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Revision Petition – Dishonor of Cheque – Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act – Accused, a land developer, convicted for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of N.I Act by the trial court, and confirmed by the Sessions Court – Revision petition filed by the accused challenging the conviction and sentence. [Para 1, 9-10, 20]
Complaint Background ...
(3)
SMT. DIVYA SHREE K.V. …PETITIONER Vs.
SRI R. RAJA …RESPONDENT D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Dishonored Cheque and Legal Notice Service Dispute – Conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth Rs.60,300 – Petitioner's argument on incorrect service of legal notice and incorrect address in the legal notice and complaint – Trial and Appellate Courts' judgments upheld by High Court. [Paras 3, 7, 13-14, 17-21]
Address ...
(4)
1. T.REMA
2. T. KRISHNAKUMAR
3. T.JAYAKRISHNAN
4. KRISHNA MOHAN ……Petitioner Vs.
1. A.K.RADHAMANI,
2. A.K.RAJEEVAN ……Respondents D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Legal Battle Over Marital Status – Dispute regarding the legal wife of late K.T. Ramakrishnan Nambiar, a Village Officer – Two women, A.K.Radhamani and T.Rema, claim to be his legitimate wives – Family Court's decision to recognize A.K.Radhamani as the legal wife and A.K.Rajeevan as the legitimate son challenged in the appeal. [Paras 1, 2, 8-11, 14, 26]
Judicial ...
(5)
Jeyaprakash ... Petitioner Vs.
State and Other ... Respondents D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Jurisdictional Challenge and Prayer for Quashing – Petitioner challenges the jurisdiction of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate and the subsequent cognizance taken by the Special Court under the Electricity Act in the alleged electricity theft case – Seeks quashing of proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.3 of 2018 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. [Paras 5, 15-17]
Allegation of Elec...
(6)
M.K.Suppuroyal ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs.
Abdul Pari ... Respondent/Complainant D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Original Petition – Quashing of Proceedings – Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings in C.C.No.81 of 2019 at the Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakanur – Petitioner/sole accused seeking to quash the criminal case against him on grounds of being baseless and filed with malafide intent. [Para 1, 3]
Property Dispute and Criminal Allegations – Disput...
(7)
KARUVANGADAN MUKTHAR @ MUTHU ….Petitioner Vs.
SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, KANNUR and Others ....Respondents D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law - Writ - Convict Seeking Education Opportunity – Petitioner, a life convict, seeks permission to join LLB course at KMCT Law College and to complete admission process – Also requests for emergency leave to attend the college for this purpose. [Para 1]
Educational Rights of Convicts – Acknowledging reformation as a key objective of criminal jurisprudence,...
(8)
MANOJ GHODEHWAR …PETITIONER Vs.
1. YASHWANT MESHRAM
2. PRATEEK GHODESHWAR (Minor through Guardian Yashwantrai Meshram) …RESPONDENTS D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Custody of Minor – Guardianship Dispute – Appeal against the order of First Additional District Judge, Waraseoni, rejecting the application for custody of the minor son under Section 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 – Trial court's decision based on the welfare of the child, considering the conduct of the appellant and the ability of maternal grandparents to provide care. ...
(9)
Erfan Timber …Applicant-Appellant Vs.
Balwinder Singh …Respondent D.D
18/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Factual Background and Trial Court Proceedings - Applicant-Appellant, engaged in the timber business, alleged that the respondent issued a cheque which was dishonoured due to 'Exceeds Arrangement' - Legal notice issued, but payment not made, leading to the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act - Trial court acquitted the respondent-accused, finding that the presumption under Section 13...