(1)
SANGITA MORYA ...PETITIONER Vs.
STATE ...RESPONDENT D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Habeas Corpus Petition – Minor Daughter Missing – Petitioner's daughter, aged 15, went missing on 18.01.2022 – Petitioner suspects neighbor Vishal's involvement in the disappearance – Vishal declared a proclaimed offender for offence under Section 363 IPC [Paras 1-2, 3].
Police Investigation Status Report – Latest status report dated 18.01.2024 presented &n...
(2)
VIKAS DINESHBHAI SUKHADIYA Vs.
STATE OF GUJARAT D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Application for Quashing FIR – Settlement of Marital Dispute – Quashing of FIR C.R. No.11191008220309 under Sections 498A, 323, 294(b), 114 of IPC and Sections 3, 7 of Dowry Prohibition Act due to amicable settlement between parties – Complaint originally filed by respondent No.2 against petitioner for dowry harassment. [Paras 1-5, 6]
Mutual Settlement – Affida...
(3)
MANSOOR.B.H.
SAKEENA BEEGUM ....PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs.
STATE OF KERALA
STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PANGOD POLICE STATION ....RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law - Issuance of Non-Bailable Warrant Without Summons – Petitioner challenges the non-bailable warrant issued against him without a prior summons based on allegations of non-cooperation with the investigation. Cited Satendar Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [2021 (10) SCC 773] [Para 2].
Categories of Offences and Issuance of Warrants – Case falls u...
(4)
Dr. Satyendra Prakash Verma .…… Petitioner Vs.
State of Odisha & another ...…. Opp. Parties D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Bail - Apprehension of Arrest – Anticipatory Bail Application – Petitioner, a doctor, apprehending arrest in connection with a case under POCSO Act and other offences – Involved in facilitating delivery and allegedly taking care of an abandoned child – Application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail [Para 1, 11-12].
FIR and Charges – ...
(5)
Arun Kumar Aggarwal ... PETITIONER Vs.
The State Information Commission, Haryana and others ... RESPONDENT(S) D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Writ Petition for Quashing Order – Petitioner sought quashing of the order passed by State Information Commission, Haryana, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, which denied information requested under the Right to Information Act – Petitioner filed a writ in the nature of certiorari for non-compliance with the judgment in Rajwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and others (...
(6)
DAVINDER SINGH ALIAS BABA …PETITIONER Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB …RESPONDENT D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Appeal – Regular Bail in NDPS Act Case – Petitioner seeking regular bail for possession of marginally higher than commercial quantity of narcotic substance (Alprazolam) – Arrested and previously granted interim bail but later declared a proclaimed offender – Re-arrested and incarcerated for over 7 months. [Para 1, 2, 6]
Bail Principles – Bail as ...
(7)
JASBIR SINGH GILL …PETITIONER Vs.
UCO BANK AND ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Petition for Pension - Petitioner, a retired employee of respondent-bank, seeks pension from 01.06.2005 under the bank's pension policy, having submitted an application which is allegedly disregarded by the respondents. [Para 1-2]
Territorial Jurisdiction Questioned - Respondents argue the High Court of Punjab and Haryana lacks territorial jurisdiction as the petitioner retired fr...
(8)
MOHD. RAFIQ …PETITIONER Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB …RESPONDENT D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Regular Bail – Grant of Bail in FIR No. 122, dated 20.06.2020, under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC – Petitioner seeks regular bail – No specific allegations against petitioner in FIR – Based on circumstantial evidence and no recovery from petitioner – Incarceration of over 3 years – Regular bail granted. [Paras 1, 3, 16]
Circumstantial Evidence – ...
(9)
ROHTAS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ....Respondents D.D
25/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Land Acquisition – Release of Acquired Lands – Petitioners seeking mandamus for release of their acquired lands under clause 7 of the policy dated 14.09.2018 – State of Haryana decided to release lands not utilized by respondents – Petitioners’ lands part of public purpose projects, hence non-releasable. [Paras 1, 10]
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 & RFCT...