Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Taking voice sample of accused not infringement of Art.20(3) of Constitution – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


D.D 30th March 2022

Whether getting voice sample of accused is infringement of Article 20 of Indian Constitution , No replied by P&H HC in Ravi Parkash Sharma Petitioner Versus State of Punjab D.D 30th March 2022

One FIR was registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act against Dr. Lakhbir Singh Bhaghowalia and Sajan Kumar, who allegedly used to take illegal gratification from Managers and owners of the hotels and shops etc. In the investigation, it revealed that present petitioner along with other co accused were also involved along with Dr. Lakhbir Singh Bhaghowalia and Sajan Kumar in collecting gratification from owners or managers of the hotels. Their telephone conversation with Dr. Lakhbir Singh Bhaghowalia, and Sajan Kumar was taken into possession by the police. An application was filed by the prosecution for taking voice sample. Same was allowed by trial court. Petitioner approached High Court.

Petitioner contended on the ground that order is in violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India and infringes the right of privacy.

Hon’ble High Court held that Voice sample in a sense resemble fingerprints and handwriting, each person has a distinctive voice with characteristic features dictated by vocal cavities and articulates. The samples are collected after having permission in accordance with law. The sample taken itself would not be evidence, rather they are for comparing the evidence already collected.

Taking voice sample not infringement of Art.20 of Constitution – P&H HC

Ravi Parkash Sharma Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/30-March-22-Ravi-Parkash-Sharma-Petitioner-Versus-State-.pdf"]

Latest Legal News