Right to Property Remains a Constitutional Right – Even Drug Law Must Respect Due Process: Telangana High Court Upholds Freezing Order Under NDPS Act Brutality Alone Cannot Justify Death Sentence Without Considering Reformative Possibility: Supreme Court Commutes Capital Punishment in Familicide Case Unilateral Right to Opt Out of Arbitration Cannot Invalidate Entire Clause: Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitration Despite SARFAESI Provisions Limited Jurisdiction Doesn’t Bar Inquiry into Adoption and Title in Eviction Cases: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Cultivating Tenants’ Eviction States Must Comply with Reimbursement Orders or Face Contempt: Supreme Court Warns on Healthcare Dues of Retired Judges Not the Requirement of Law That Applicant Should Sit Idle Till His Premises Are Not Released: Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant from Cinema Hall After 63 Years Belated Representations Cannot Revive Stale Claims: Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation under Administrative Tribunals Act When the Police Investigation Is Callous, Justice Demands a Neutral Hand: Supreme Court Upholds CBI Probe into Suspicious Death of Real Estate Tycoon Linked to MP Vague Charges, Denial of Cross-Examination—How Can There Be a Fair Trial? Supreme Court Slams Bihar Police for Unlawful Dismissal of Constable Justice Delayed Cannot Become Persecution Prolonged: Supreme Court Bars Fresh Disciplinary Action Against Police Officer 40 Years After 1984 Delhi Riots Membership in Waqf Board Ends with Bar Council Tenure: Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 14 Wakf Act to Muslim Advocates Set-Off Under Section 428 CrPC Applies Only to Custody in the Same Case in Which Conviction Is Recorded: Supreme Court Refers Conflicting Precedents for Authoritative Interpretation Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Statutory Non-Compliance Cannot Be Cured by Procedural Amendment: Allahabad High Court Invalidates Post-Limitation Impleadment in Election Petition Gross Dereliction of Duty That Traverses Beyond Negligence Into the Arena of Palpable Fraud: Calcutta High Court Fixes Bank’s Liability for Premature FD Encashment Even a Trespasser in Settled Possession Cannot Be Dispossessed Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes in Family Property Dispute Taxation Law | Issuance of Notices Without Application of Mind Violates Fundamental Principles: PH High Court Quashes Notices A Soldier Cannot Be Denied Disability Pension Just Because It Was Below 20%: Supreme Court Grants Full Benefits to Army Veteran Invalided Out for Seizure Disorder State Cannot Let Bureaucratic Delay Decide a Judge’s Seniority: Supreme Court Grants Retrospective Seniority to Civil Judges Selected in 2003 Prosecution Cannot Hijack Court’s Power to Frame Charges Under Section 216 CrPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Alteration of Charges in Double Murder Trial “Next Time We Will Take Suo Motu Action”: Supreme Court Warns Rahul Gandhi Over Remarks On Savarkar

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Status for Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Employees

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has affirmed the decision to confer permanent status to the employees of Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited (TNMSC). The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Sanjay Karol and Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale, resolves a prolonged legal battle between TNMSC and the Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Employees Welfare Union.

Background

The case originated from the application of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981, which mandates permanent status for workmen who have rendered continuous service for a specified period. The TNMSC, established under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, contended that it was exempt from this Act.

In 2001, the Inspector of Labour, Circle-III, Chennai, had ruled in favor of the employees, granting permanent status to 53 workmen. This decision was challenged by TNMSC but upheld by the High Court of Madras in 2019. Subsequently, both TNMSC and the employees' union filed appeals before the Supreme Court.

Key Points of the Judgment

Applicability of the Act: The Supreme Court ruled that TNMSC qualifies as an industrial establishment under Section 2(3)(e) of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. The Court observed that the Corporation's activities are commercial in nature, making it subject to the Act.

Continuous Service Requirement: The Court confirmed that the employees met the requirement of continuous service for 480 days over a period of 24 months, as stipulated by the Act.

No Exemption: The argument that TNMSC was exempt from the Act under Section 7, which pertains to establishments engaged in construction, was dismissed. The Court clarified that the Corporation's involvement in construction did not constitute its primary function.

Compliance with Labour Inspector's Order: The Supreme Court directed that the Labour Inspector's order conferring permanent status to the employees be enforced. The High Court's suggestion to raise an industrial dispute was deemed unnecessary and unjustified.

Dismissal of TNMSC's Appeal: TNMSC's appeal was dismissed, and the Court upheld the rights of the employees as conferred by the Inspector of Labour.

Court Observations and Analysis

Justice Karol, delivering the judgment, emphasized that TNMSC’s commercial activities, including the procurement and distribution of medical supplies and undertaking construction projects, clearly classify it as an industrial establishment. The judgment noted the profits recorded by TNMSC in previous years as evidence of its commercial operations.

The Court also referenced several precedents, including the landmark case of State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi and Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Casteribe Rajya Parivahan Karmachari Sanghathana, reinforcing the principles of workers' rights to regularization and permanent status.

Conclusion The Supreme Court's decision marks a significant victory for the employees of TNMSC, ensuring job security and benefits associated with permanent employment. The judgment underscores the applicability of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments Act to various entities, reinforcing the protection of workers' rights under Indian industrial law.

The case may set a precedent for similar disputes in other states, potentially influencing future interpretations of industrial establishment definitions and workers' rights under Indian law.

Date of Decision: May 17, 2024

Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited vs. Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Employees Welfare Union & Anr.

Latest News