CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones

Supreme Court Rejects Appeal, Upholds Life Sentence for Husband Who Set Wife Ablaze

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal and upheld the life sentence of a husband who was convicted of causing the death of his wife by setting her ablaze. The case, involving Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, had gone through multiple stages of legal proceedings, ultimately leading to the conviction of the accused.

The court’s observations in the judgment shed light on the reasoning behind this decision. The verdict stated, ”The appeal lacks merit due to overwhelming evidence proving the appellant’s guilt in the intentional act of murder.” This highlights the court’s reliance on substantial evidence presented during the trial.

The crucial aspect of the case revolved around the evidence provided, including multiple dying declarations by the deceased wife. The judgment noted, ”Two dying declarations by the deceased wife, one before Judicial First Class Magistrate and the other recorded by Head Constable, along with the corroborative testimonies of other witnesses, establish the appellant’s act of setting his wife ablaze after she poured kerosene on herself amidst a quarrel.” This emphasizes the significance of these declarations in establishing the guilt of the appellant.

The appellant had argued for a charge under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC, citing a lack of premeditation and a sudden quarrel. However, the court rejected this argument, stating, ”The act of setting ablaze was deliberate with a history of domestic quarrels, thus not falling within the ambit of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, and hence confirmed as murder under Section 302 IPC.” This decision highlights the court’s interpretation of the law in the context of the case.

The judgment also addressed the appellant’s liberty, noting, ”Conviction and sentence of life imprisonment upheld with a note on appellant’s liberty to apply for remission as per state policy.” This indicates that the court has considered the appellant’s potential for remission in the future.

Supreme Court’s decision in this case underscores the importance of strong evidence and the application of relevant legal provisions. The conviction and life sentence of the appellant have been upheld, sending a message about the consequences of deliberate acts leading to loss of life.

Date of Decision: NOVEMBER 01, 2023

ANIL KUMAR VS STATE OF KERALA   

 

Latest Legal News