Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Supreme Court Rejects Acquittal Plea in Sanjay Babu Lal Case, Upholds Conviction under IPC Sections 304B and 498A

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the conviction of Sanjay Babu Lal under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The apex court, while reviewing the case, stated, “We do not think that the appellant – Sanjay Babu Lal has made out a case for acquittal.” This statement came after a detailed examination of trial court records, including witness statements, medical reports, and crucial photographs marked as Exhibits PC to PE.

 

Sanjay Babu Lal, who had been serving a life sentence, sought review of his conviction for the offences, dating back to the year 2002. The Supreme Court, acknowledging the duration already served and the fact that Lal has a differently-abled son, has altered the sentence. In a compassionate move, the Court reduced Lal’s punishment from life imprisonment to “imprisonment for the period already undergone,” which amounts to approximately ten years and nine months as of October 3, 2023.

 

Additionally, Lal is mandated to pay a fine of Rs.10,000, with a default sentence of three months of simple imprisonment. The Court’s order ensures his immediate release upon payment of the fine, provided he is not required in any other case.

 

This decision, rendered by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M. Trivedi, also maintains the sentence under Section 498A of the IPC, with both sentences to run concurrently. The Supreme Court’s decision, delivered on November 8, 2023, comes as a closure to a case spanning over two decades, balancing legal rigor with a consideration of the individual circumstances of the convict.

Date of Decision: NOVEMBER 08, 2023

SANJAY BABU LAL VS STATE OF HARYANA 

Latest Legal News