Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Rejects Acquittal Plea in Sanjay Babu Lal Case, Upholds Conviction under IPC Sections 304B and 498A

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the conviction of Sanjay Babu Lal under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The apex court, while reviewing the case, stated, “We do not think that the appellant – Sanjay Babu Lal has made out a case for acquittal.” This statement came after a detailed examination of trial court records, including witness statements, medical reports, and crucial photographs marked as Exhibits PC to PE.

 

Sanjay Babu Lal, who had been serving a life sentence, sought review of his conviction for the offences, dating back to the year 2002. The Supreme Court, acknowledging the duration already served and the fact that Lal has a differently-abled son, has altered the sentence. In a compassionate move, the Court reduced Lal’s punishment from life imprisonment to “imprisonment for the period already undergone,” which amounts to approximately ten years and nine months as of October 3, 2023.

 

Additionally, Lal is mandated to pay a fine of Rs.10,000, with a default sentence of three months of simple imprisonment. The Court’s order ensures his immediate release upon payment of the fine, provided he is not required in any other case.

 

This decision, rendered by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M. Trivedi, also maintains the sentence under Section 498A of the IPC, with both sentences to run concurrently. The Supreme Court’s decision, delivered on November 8, 2023, comes as a closure to a case spanning over two decades, balancing legal rigor with a consideration of the individual circumstances of the convict.

Date of Decision: NOVEMBER 08, 2023

SANJAY BABU LAL VS STATE OF HARYANA 

Latest Legal News