Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |    

Supreme Court Rejects Acquittal Plea in Sanjay Babu Lal Case, Upholds Conviction under IPC Sections 304B and 498A

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the conviction of Sanjay Babu Lal under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The apex court, while reviewing the case, stated, “We do not think that the appellant – Sanjay Babu Lal has made out a case for acquittal.” This statement came after a detailed examination of trial court records, including witness statements, medical reports, and crucial photographs marked as Exhibits PC to PE.

 

Sanjay Babu Lal, who had been serving a life sentence, sought review of his conviction for the offences, dating back to the year 2002. The Supreme Court, acknowledging the duration already served and the fact that Lal has a differently-abled son, has altered the sentence. In a compassionate move, the Court reduced Lal’s punishment from life imprisonment to “imprisonment for the period already undergone,” which amounts to approximately ten years and nine months as of October 3, 2023.

 

Additionally, Lal is mandated to pay a fine of Rs.10,000, with a default sentence of three months of simple imprisonment. The Court’s order ensures his immediate release upon payment of the fine, provided he is not required in any other case.

 

This decision, rendered by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M. Trivedi, also maintains the sentence under Section 498A of the IPC, with both sentences to run concurrently. The Supreme Court’s decision, delivered on November 8, 2023, comes as a closure to a case spanning over two decades, balancing legal rigor with a consideration of the individual circumstances of the convict.

Date of Decision: NOVEMBER 08, 2023

SANJAY BABU LAL VS STATE OF HARYANA 

Similar News