Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Rejects Acquittal Plea in Sanjay Babu Lal Case, Upholds Conviction under IPC Sections 304B and 498A

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the conviction of Sanjay Babu Lal under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The apex court, while reviewing the case, stated, “We do not think that the appellant – Sanjay Babu Lal has made out a case for acquittal.” This statement came after a detailed examination of trial court records, including witness statements, medical reports, and crucial photographs marked as Exhibits PC to PE.

 

Sanjay Babu Lal, who had been serving a life sentence, sought review of his conviction for the offences, dating back to the year 2002. The Supreme Court, acknowledging the duration already served and the fact that Lal has a differently-abled son, has altered the sentence. In a compassionate move, the Court reduced Lal’s punishment from life imprisonment to “imprisonment for the period already undergone,” which amounts to approximately ten years and nine months as of October 3, 2023.

 

Additionally, Lal is mandated to pay a fine of Rs.10,000, with a default sentence of three months of simple imprisonment. The Court’s order ensures his immediate release upon payment of the fine, provided he is not required in any other case.

 

This decision, rendered by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M. Trivedi, also maintains the sentence under Section 498A of the IPC, with both sentences to run concurrently. The Supreme Court’s decision, delivered on November 8, 2023, comes as a closure to a case spanning over two decades, balancing legal rigor with a consideration of the individual circumstances of the convict.

Date of Decision: NOVEMBER 08, 2023

SANJAY BABU LAL VS STATE OF HARYANA 

Latest Legal News