Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Prohibits Redensification and Apartmentalization in Corbusier's Chandigarh to Preserve Heritage Status

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has taken a significant step towards preserving the heritage status of Corbusier's Chandigarh by prohibiting redensification and apartmentalization in Phase-I of the city. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna, emphasizes the need to maintain the unique character and integrity of the city.

The court's decision comes in response to a case challenging the rampant urban development and haphazard construction practices that have plagued Chandigarh, once considered an ideal city. The judgment notes the adverse impact of unregulated growth, such as traffic congestion, inadequate infrastructure, and the depletion of natural resources.

"Fragmentation of Residential Units Prohibited to Protect Heritage Status: Supreme Court." This highlights the court's clear stance on preventing the division, fragmentation, bifurcation, and apartmentalization of residential units in Phase-I of Chandigarh, which has a heritage value due to its association with renowned architect Le Corbusier.

The Supreme Court has directed the Heritage Committee to assess the issue of redensification in Phase-I. The committee's evaluation will take into account the preservation of the northern sectors of Chandigarh, which hold significant architectural and historical value. It will also consider the impact of redensification on parking and traffic issues within the city.

To enforce these measures, the court has mandated the Chandigarh Administration to amend the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031 (CMP-2031) and the Chandigarh Estate Rules of 2017. These amendments will align with the Heritage Committee's recommendations and require approval from the Central Government, ensuring the preservation of Chandigarh's heritage status.

The judgment further highlights the court's concern for sustainable development and environmental protection. It emphasizes the importance of striking a balance between urban growth and preserving the natural environment. The court recommends the implementation of Environmental Impact Assessment studies before granting permissions for urban development projects.

Citing the need for broader attention, the court calls upon the legislature, executive, and policymakers at the central and state levels to take note of the damage caused by unplanned development and prioritize necessary measures for environmental conservation.

The verdict, which sets a precedent for future urban development cases, has been applauded by experts and heritage enthusiasts who believe that preserving the integrity of Corbusier's Chandigarh is essential to safeguard its cultural and architectural heritage.

The judgment concludes by urging the Cabinet Secretary to the Union of India and the Chief Secretaries of all states to consider the court's observations and take earnest steps to protect and promote sustainable development practices.

Overall, the Supreme Court's decision to prohibit redensification and apartmentalization in Corbusier's Chandigarh underscores the significance of preserving heritage and maintaining a balance between development and environmental conservation. The judgment serves as a clarion call for responsible urban planning and development across the country.

DATE OF DECISION: January 10, 2023

RESIDENT’S WELFARE ASSOCIATION vs THE UNION TERRITORY OF  CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS .   

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/10-Jan-2023-Chandigarh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News