Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Prohibits Redensification and Apartmentalization in Corbusier's Chandigarh to Preserve Heritage Status

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has taken a significant step towards preserving the heritage status of Corbusier's Chandigarh by prohibiting redensification and apartmentalization in Phase-I of the city. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna, emphasizes the need to maintain the unique character and integrity of the city.

The court's decision comes in response to a case challenging the rampant urban development and haphazard construction practices that have plagued Chandigarh, once considered an ideal city. The judgment notes the adverse impact of unregulated growth, such as traffic congestion, inadequate infrastructure, and the depletion of natural resources.

"Fragmentation of Residential Units Prohibited to Protect Heritage Status: Supreme Court." This highlights the court's clear stance on preventing the division, fragmentation, bifurcation, and apartmentalization of residential units in Phase-I of Chandigarh, which has a heritage value due to its association with renowned architect Le Corbusier.

The Supreme Court has directed the Heritage Committee to assess the issue of redensification in Phase-I. The committee's evaluation will take into account the preservation of the northern sectors of Chandigarh, which hold significant architectural and historical value. It will also consider the impact of redensification on parking and traffic issues within the city.

To enforce these measures, the court has mandated the Chandigarh Administration to amend the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031 (CMP-2031) and the Chandigarh Estate Rules of 2017. These amendments will align with the Heritage Committee's recommendations and require approval from the Central Government, ensuring the preservation of Chandigarh's heritage status.

The judgment further highlights the court's concern for sustainable development and environmental protection. It emphasizes the importance of striking a balance between urban growth and preserving the natural environment. The court recommends the implementation of Environmental Impact Assessment studies before granting permissions for urban development projects.

Citing the need for broader attention, the court calls upon the legislature, executive, and policymakers at the central and state levels to take note of the damage caused by unplanned development and prioritize necessary measures for environmental conservation.

The verdict, which sets a precedent for future urban development cases, has been applauded by experts and heritage enthusiasts who believe that preserving the integrity of Corbusier's Chandigarh is essential to safeguard its cultural and architectural heritage.

The judgment concludes by urging the Cabinet Secretary to the Union of India and the Chief Secretaries of all states to consider the court's observations and take earnest steps to protect and promote sustainable development practices.

Overall, the Supreme Court's decision to prohibit redensification and apartmentalization in Corbusier's Chandigarh underscores the significance of preserving heritage and maintaining a balance between development and environmental conservation. The judgment serves as a clarion call for responsible urban planning and development across the country.

DATE OF DECISION: January 10, 2023

RESIDENT’S WELFARE ASSOCIATION vs THE UNION TERRITORY OF  CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS .   

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/10-Jan-2023-Chandigarh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News