"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in 'Public Interest' as Rooted in Personal Grievances Related to Insolvency Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court today dismissed a writ petition filed by renowned cardiac surgeon Dr. K.M. Cherian, observing that the petition, purportedly in the public interest, was in fact related to his specific grievance regarding the insolvency proceedings against Frontier Lifeline Private Limited (FLPL).

The bench comprising the Chief Justice and Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Satish Chandra Sharma noted, "The above narration will clearly indicate that what is now preferred as a petition, which was purportedly filed in the public interest, is, in fact, relatable to the petitioner’s specific grievance in regard to proceedings of insolvency against FLPL." This observation underlined the Court's rationale for not entertaining the petition.

Dr. Cherian, a Padma Shri awardee and pioneer in pediatric cardiac surgery in India, had established FLPL and Frontier Mediville, aiming to bridge the gaps in affordable healthcare and research. However, he faced substantial challenges due to regulatory delays, financial roadblocks, and insolvency proceedings, leading to the shutdown of Frontier Mediville.

The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 (Union of India) to create guidelines for medical research approvals, facilitate the growth of private medical research institutions, and examine the alleged irregularities in the insolvency proceedings of FLPL.

The Court observed that the petition appeared to be a facade of public interest to address personal grievances. "We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain a petition purportedly in the public interest on the above ground," the order stated, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.

 Date of Decision: 25-01-2024

K.M. Cherian VS Union Of India & Ors.           

 

Similar News