Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in 'Public Interest' as Rooted in Personal Grievances Related to Insolvency Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court today dismissed a writ petition filed by renowned cardiac surgeon Dr. K.M. Cherian, observing that the petition, purportedly in the public interest, was in fact related to his specific grievance regarding the insolvency proceedings against Frontier Lifeline Private Limited (FLPL).

The bench comprising the Chief Justice and Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Satish Chandra Sharma noted, "The above narration will clearly indicate that what is now preferred as a petition, which was purportedly filed in the public interest, is, in fact, relatable to the petitioner’s specific grievance in regard to proceedings of insolvency against FLPL." This observation underlined the Court's rationale for not entertaining the petition.

Dr. Cherian, a Padma Shri awardee and pioneer in pediatric cardiac surgery in India, had established FLPL and Frontier Mediville, aiming to bridge the gaps in affordable healthcare and research. However, he faced substantial challenges due to regulatory delays, financial roadblocks, and insolvency proceedings, leading to the shutdown of Frontier Mediville.

The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 (Union of India) to create guidelines for medical research approvals, facilitate the growth of private medical research institutions, and examine the alleged irregularities in the insolvency proceedings of FLPL.

The Court observed that the petition appeared to be a facade of public interest to address personal grievances. "We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain a petition purportedly in the public interest on the above ground," the order stated, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.

 Date of Decision: 25-01-2024

K.M. Cherian VS Union Of India & Ors.           

 

Similar News