High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

Section 207 Cr.P.C. Limited To Documents Relied Upon By Prosecution': Punjab And Haryana High Court Denies Access To 'Unrelied Upon' Documents In CBI Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided by Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul, upheld the limitation of Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) to documents explicitly relied upon by the prosecution. The Court dismissed a petition seeking access to documents not listed as 'relied upon' in the charge sheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Legal Context and Petitioner's Request:

The petitioner, Kalyani Singh, approached the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to quash an earlier order that dismissed her application for accessing certain documents listed in a seizure memo but not 'relied upon' in the CBI’s charge sheet. These documents were argued by Singh to be crucial for her defense.

Facts and Issues Presented:

Kalyani Singh's application was initially denied by the Special Judge, CBI, Chandigarh, prompting the present petition. Singh contested the prosecution’s designation of some seized documents as 'unrelied upon', arguing all items in the seizure memo should be accessible to her since some of those documents were already provided to the mother of the deceased in the related case.

Court’s Detailed Assessment:

Scope of Section 207 Cr.P.C.:

The Court noted that Section 207 Cr.P.C. mandates supplying the accused only with documents the prosecution is relying upon. Justice Kaul emphasized, "The provision aims to prevent surprise at trial and ensure fair opportunity for defense."

On 'Unrelied Upon' Documents:

Referring to the Supreme Court’s directives, the Court observed that documents not being relied upon by the prosecution could not be compelled under Section 207 but might be accessible under Section 91 during trial if found necessary.

Handling of Case Diaries and Police Files:

The Court highlighted statutory restrictions against supplying case diaries and police files under Section 172(3) of Cr.P.C., reinforcing the confidentiality and integrity of ongoing investigations.

Decision and Conclusion:

The High Court denied Kalyani Singh’s petition, confirming the original decision of the Special Judge, CBI, Chandigarh. The Court held that documents classified as 'unrelied upon' are not due to be disclosed at the pre-trial stage under Section 207 Cr.P.C.

Date of Decision: April 25, 2024

Kalyani Singh vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Similar News