Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Section 207 Cr.P.C. Limited To Documents Relied Upon By Prosecution': Punjab And Haryana High Court Denies Access To 'Unrelied Upon' Documents In CBI Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided by Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul, upheld the limitation of Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) to documents explicitly relied upon by the prosecution. The Court dismissed a petition seeking access to documents not listed as 'relied upon' in the charge sheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Legal Context and Petitioner's Request:

The petitioner, Kalyani Singh, approached the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to quash an earlier order that dismissed her application for accessing certain documents listed in a seizure memo but not 'relied upon' in the CBI’s charge sheet. These documents were argued by Singh to be crucial for her defense.

Facts and Issues Presented:

Kalyani Singh's application was initially denied by the Special Judge, CBI, Chandigarh, prompting the present petition. Singh contested the prosecution’s designation of some seized documents as 'unrelied upon', arguing all items in the seizure memo should be accessible to her since some of those documents were already provided to the mother of the deceased in the related case.

Court’s Detailed Assessment:

Scope of Section 207 Cr.P.C.:

The Court noted that Section 207 Cr.P.C. mandates supplying the accused only with documents the prosecution is relying upon. Justice Kaul emphasized, "The provision aims to prevent surprise at trial and ensure fair opportunity for defense."

On 'Unrelied Upon' Documents:

Referring to the Supreme Court’s directives, the Court observed that documents not being relied upon by the prosecution could not be compelled under Section 207 but might be accessible under Section 91 during trial if found necessary.

Handling of Case Diaries and Police Files:

The Court highlighted statutory restrictions against supplying case diaries and police files under Section 172(3) of Cr.P.C., reinforcing the confidentiality and integrity of ongoing investigations.

Decision and Conclusion:

The High Court denied Kalyani Singh’s petition, confirming the original decision of the Special Judge, CBI, Chandigarh. The Court held that documents classified as 'unrelied upon' are not due to be disclosed at the pre-trial stage under Section 207 Cr.P.C.

Date of Decision: April 25, 2024

Kalyani Singh vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Latest Legal News