Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Rajasthan High Court Affirms Maternity Leave Rights for Surrogate Mothers

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Rajasthan High Court has set a precedent by recognizing the maternity leave rights of surrogate mothers. Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, in the case [2023:RJ-JP:33972], ruled in favor of Smt. Chanda Keswani, who challenged the denial of maternity leave for her twins born through surrogacy.

“Motherhood is the mother of all civilizations,” the court observed, underscoring the significance of the maternal bond irrespective of the method of childbirth. This statement not only acknowledges the traditional role of mothers but also embraces the modern dynamics of motherhood in the context of reproductive technologies.

The court delved into the question of whether state governments can differentiate between natural, biological, and surrogate mothers regarding maternity leave. The petitioner, after being refused maternity leave by the state authorities, sought redress under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court’s order to grant her 180 days of maternity leave marks a significant step in the recognition of surrogate mothers’ rights.

Justice Dhand, in his ruling, emphasized that “the right to life includes the right to motherhood and also the right of every child to full development,” echoing the constitutional mandate of Article 21. The judgment reflects a broader understanding of maternity, beyond the biological act of childbirth, to include the nurturing and care of a child.

The court also highlighted that the current legal framework under the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, does not adequately address the rights of surrogate mothers. This gap in the legislation, the court noted, needs to be filled to ensure that all forms of motherhood are respected and protected.

Rajasthan High Court’s decision sets a precedent for other courts and legislatures, advocating for changes in the law to accommodate the evolving nature of family and parenthood in modern society. This ruling not only grants relief to the petitioner but also paves the way for a more inclusive understanding of maternity and parental rights in India.

Date of Decision: 08/11/2023

Smt. Chanda Keswani VS State of Rajasthan

Latest Legal News