MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Rajasthan High Court Affirms Maternity Leave Rights for Surrogate Mothers

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Rajasthan High Court has set a precedent by recognizing the maternity leave rights of surrogate mothers. Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, in the case [2023:RJ-JP:33972], ruled in favor of Smt. Chanda Keswani, who challenged the denial of maternity leave for her twins born through surrogacy.

“Motherhood is the mother of all civilizations,” the court observed, underscoring the significance of the maternal bond irrespective of the method of childbirth. This statement not only acknowledges the traditional role of mothers but also embraces the modern dynamics of motherhood in the context of reproductive technologies.

The court delved into the question of whether state governments can differentiate between natural, biological, and surrogate mothers regarding maternity leave. The petitioner, after being refused maternity leave by the state authorities, sought redress under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court’s order to grant her 180 days of maternity leave marks a significant step in the recognition of surrogate mothers’ rights.

Justice Dhand, in his ruling, emphasized that “the right to life includes the right to motherhood and also the right of every child to full development,” echoing the constitutional mandate of Article 21. The judgment reflects a broader understanding of maternity, beyond the biological act of childbirth, to include the nurturing and care of a child.

The court also highlighted that the current legal framework under the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, does not adequately address the rights of surrogate mothers. This gap in the legislation, the court noted, needs to be filled to ensure that all forms of motherhood are respected and protected.

Rajasthan High Court’s decision sets a precedent for other courts and legislatures, advocating for changes in the law to accommodate the evolving nature of family and parenthood in modern society. This ruling not only grants relief to the petitioner but also paves the way for a more inclusive understanding of maternity and parental rights in India.

Date of Decision: 08/11/2023

Smt. Chanda Keswani VS State of Rajasthan

Latest Legal News