SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Measures of Constraint against State-Owned Property: ICJ

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

D.D: 10 JUNE 2022

Regarding Article 48 of the Court's Statute and Articles 31, 44, 45, of the Court's Rules, By Order dated 10 June 2022, the International Court of Justice set the deadlines for filing the Memorial by the Federal Republic of Germany and the Counter-Memorial by the Italian Republic in the case concerning Questions of Jurisdictional Immunities of the State and Measures of Constraint against State-Owned Property as 12 June 2023 and 12 June 2024, respectively (Germany v. Italy).

Having regard to the Application filed by the Federal Republic of Germany (hereinafter "Germany") on 29 April 2022 instituting proceedings against the Italian Republic (hereinafter "Italy") regarding the alleged violation by Italy of its obligation to respect Germany's sovereign immunity, as well as the Request for the indication of provisional measures contained in the Application, the Court hereby issues the following provisional measures:

Having regard to the letter dated 4 May 2022, in which the Agent of Germany informed the Court that, following certain exchanges between the Parties, his Government had decided to "withdraw its Request for the indication of provisional measures," Having regard to the Order dated 10 May 2022, in which the President of the Court recorded Germany's withdrawal of its Request for the indication of provisional measures; Whereas a meeting was held by the President of the Court; and Having regard to the letter dated 4 May

Done in French and English, with the French text being authoritative, at the Peace Palace in The Hague on the tenth day of June, twenty-two, in three copies, of which one will be placed in the archives of the Court and the other two will be sent to the governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Italian Republic, respectively.

Germany

v/s

Italy

Download Order

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Garmany-vs-italy.pdf"]

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:21 AM
Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court
  • by sayum
    01 October 2026 8:20 AM
Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court