Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Marriage Cannot Be Solemnized Without Proper Rites and Ceremonies: Allahabad High Court

23 August 2024 12:58 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


The Allahabad High Court, in a significant ruling, has declared the alleged marriage between the appellant and the respondent as null and void due to the lack of customary rites and ceremonies required under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Rajan Roy and Om Prakash Shukla, overturns the Family Court's decision which had dismissed the appellant's suit and decreed the respondent's suit for restitution of conjugal rights. 

Facts of the Case: The appellant filed a suit under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, claiming that her alleged marriage to the respondent was fraudulent and without her consent. The respondent, on the other hand, filed a suit under Section 9 of the same Act, seeking restitution of conjugal rights. Both suits were consolidated and decided by a common judgment, which the appellant challenged. 

The appellant's family, influenced by the respondent, a self-proclaimed spiritual guru, was allegedly manipulated into believing that a marriage had taken place. The respondent claimed the marriage was solemnized on 05.07.2009 at Arya Samaj Mandir and registered on 03.08.2009. However, the appellant contended that she had never consented to the marriage and that it was based on deceit and fraud. 

Court Observations and Views: 

Credibility of Customary Rites: The High Court scrutinized the evidence and found that the necessary rites and ceremonies for a valid Hindu marriage, as stipulated in Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, were not performed. "The respondent has failed to prove that the marriage was solemnized in accordance with the customary rites and ceremonies," the bench noted. The court highlighted that the presence of the appellant at the Arya Samaj Mandir and the Registrar's Office did not suffice to establish a valid marriage. 

 

Legal Reasoning: The judgment extensively discussed the importance of performing the requisite ceremonies for a Hindu marriage. The court reiterated that a valid marriage under Hindu law requires the performance of specific rites and ceremonies, which were not proven in this case. "The burden to prove the marriage as per Hindu rites and customs was upon the respondent, and he failed to discharge this burden," the court stated. 

Quotes from the Judgment: Justice Rajan Roy remarked, "Unless and until the marriage is performed with appropriate ceremonies and in due form, it cannot be said to be 'solemnized' in accordance with Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955." 

Justice Om Prakash Shukla added, "The issuance of a marriage certificate by itself does not establish a valid marriage in the absence of proof of the requisite ceremonies." 

Conclusion: The Allahabad High Court's ruling underscores the critical importance of adhering to the prescribed ceremonies for a Hindu marriage. By declaring the alleged marriage null and void, the judgment reinforces the legal framework that safeguards individuals from fraudulent claims of marriage. This decision is expected to have a significant impact on similar cases, emphasizing the necessity of proving the performance of customary rites and ceremonies. 

Case Title: XXXXX  VS  XXXX

Date of Decision:05.07.2024 

Similar News