MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Quashes Punjab Government's Decision to Revert IG Gursharan Singh to DIG

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court today overturned the decision of the Punjab government to revert Gursharan Singh and two others from their positions as Inspector Generals (IG) to Deputy Inspector Generals (DIG), citing a significant breach of natural justice due to the failure to provide a proper hearing.

The court examined the infringement of the principles of natural justice, highlighting the absence of a follow-up hearing after the original meeting with the Chief Minister was postponed and never rescheduled.

After initial show cause notices and multiple rescheduling, the petitioners were set to have a personal hearing before the Chief Minister, which was postponed. No new date was provided, and the government subsequently issued reversion orders, leading to this legal challenge.

Initial Procedures: The timeline of notices and scheduled hearings pointed to an anticipated resolution through a personal hearing that never materialized.

Procedural Breach: "The respondent was duty-bound to fix another date for personal hearing," remarked Justice Bansal, indicating the administration's negligence in fulfilling its obligations under natural justice.

Focus on Natural Justice: The court refrained from addressing the merits of the reversion, focusing instead on the procedural flaws that led to the setting aside of the impugned orders.

Decision The court invalidated the orders reverting the petitioners to the rank of DIG and directed the respondents to ensure a proper hearing is held, issuing new orders accordingly by June 15, 2024.

Date of Decision: May 10, 2024

Gursharan Singh Sandhu and others v. State of Punjab and others

Latest Legal News