Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court

High Court of Kerala Affirms Conviction in Wife’s Premeditated Murder: Consistent Chain of Evidence Proves Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kerala High Court dismisses appeal, emphasizing the reliability of circumstantial evidence and forensic reports linking the accused to the crime scene.

In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has upheld the conviction and sentencing of Biju, the appellant, for the premeditated murder of his wife. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices P.B. Suresh Kumar and M.B. Snehalatha, affirmed the trial court’s decision, highlighting a consistent chain of circumstantial evidence and forensic corroboration that proved the appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Facts of the Case:

The appellant, Biju, was convicted of murdering his wife, following a tumultuous relationship exacerbated by legal actions taken by the victim against him for allegedly molesting their minor daughter. On March 21, 2017, the victim was found in a pool of blood by a relative, suffering from multiple stab wounds. Despite immediate medical attention, she succumbed to her injuries en route to the hospital. The prosecution’s case was built on a combination of eyewitness testimonies, forensic evidence, and circumstantial details linking Biju to the crime.

Court Observations and Views:

Credibility of Circumstantial Evidence:

The High Court meticulously examined the circumstantial evidence presented. Key witnesses, including relatives and neighbors, testified seeing Biju near the crime scene with blood on his body shortly after the incident. The court noted, “The consistent testimonies of witnesses place the appellant at the scene of the crime, corroborating the sequence of events leading to the victim’s death.”

Forensic Evidence:

Forensic analysis played a crucial role in the judgment. The knife (MO1) used in the murder, the appellant’s blood-stained chappals (MO2), and other material objects found at the crime scene were pivotal. The court stated, “The forensic reports linking the bloodstains on the material objects to the appellant provide compelling evidence of his involvement in the crime.”

Witness Testimonies and Identification:

Addressing procedural deficiencies, the court acknowledged lapses in witness identification of the accused in the dock. However, it ruled these non-fatal to the case outcome due to the witnesses’ prior acquaintance with the appellant. “The close familiarity of the witnesses with the appellant mitigates the procedural lapses observed during the trial,” the judgment noted.

Legal Reasoning:

The court emphasized the established principles of circumstantial evidence, noting, “The circumstances proved must be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused and exclude any other possible hypothesis.” The court found that the prosecution successfully established an unbroken chain of events leading to the appellant’s guilt.

Quotes from the Judgment:

Justice P.B. Suresh Kumar remarked, “The consistent chain of circumstantial evidence, supported by forensic reports, conclusively proves the appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.”

Conclusion:

The dismissal of Biju’s appeal reinforces the judiciary’s commitment to upholding convictions based on robust circumstantial and forensic evidence. The judgment serves as a significant precedent, emphasizing the importance of a consistent chain of evidence in criminal convictions. This decision underscores the reliability of forensic corroboration in establishing guilt, even when procedural deficiencies in witness testimonies are present.

 

Date of Decision: July 5, 2024

Biju vs. State of Kerala

 

Similar News