Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

High Court Directs BPCL to Decide Fate of Impugned Letter of Intent in Accordance with Applicable Rules and Regulations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal, has directed Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) to decide the fate of the impugned Letter of Intent (LOI) issued for the establishment of a petrol pump. This direction comes in the wake of the Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa rejecting BPCL's application seeking a No Objection Certificate (NOC) in terms of Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules.

The core legal issue pertains to the grant of LOI by BPCL for setting up a petrol pump, the procedural compliance with government guidelines, and the subsequent rejection of the NOC application by the Deputy Commissioner.

The petitioner, Deepak Goyal, challenged the allotment process after being unsuccessful in the initial draw of lots for the petrol pump, which saw respondent No.7 receiving the LOI. The case was complicated by the fact that the land initially offered by respondent No.7 faced objections from the PWD Department for not adhering to the government guidelines and instructions. Despite offering alternate land, the NOC from the PWD Department was not granted, leading to a legal stalemate.

Justice Bansal meticulously analyzed the sequence of events and the legal provisions involved. His observation pointed out that the rejection of the NOC application by the Deputy Commissioner does not automatically lead to the cancellation of the LOI issued to respondent No.7. The court noted, "Rejection of application seeking NOC in terms of Rule 144 of Petroleum Rules does not automatically entail cancellation of Letter of Intent issued by any oil company in favor of any candidate."

The judgment reinforces the importance of adherence to the Petroleum Rules, particularly Rule 144, which governs the issuance of NOCs for setting up petrol pumps. It also highlights the procedural necessity for oil companies like BPCL to follow government guidelines and instructions in issuing LOIs.

The court disposed of the petition with a directive to BPCL to decide the fate of the impugned LOI. The decision must be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the brochure, along with applicable rules and regulations. The judgment does not automatically cancel the LOI but mandates a reevaluation by BPCL in light of the Deputy Commissioner's rejection of the NOC.

Date of Decision: January 31, 2024

Deepak Goyal vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and others

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/PH-31-Jan-24-Deepika-Goyal-vs-Bharat-Petro-Ltd.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News