Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Acquits Parents in Infanticide Case: Act on Body Believed Lifeless Does Not Constitute Culpable Homicide

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Kerala High Court today acquitted a couple previously convicted for the murder of their infant daughter. The pivotal legal observation by the Honorable Justices P.B. Suresh Kumar and Johnson John stated, "Act on body believed to be lifeless does not constitute culpable homicide," setting a significant precedent in criminal jurisprudence.

The appellants, Prathibha and Bashdev, were initially convicted by the Additional Sessions Court for offenses under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), pertaining to murder and the disposal of evidence. The case hinged on whether the act of disposing of a body, believed to be lifeless, could attract the offense of culpable homicide.

In the detailed judgment, the High Court meticulously analyzed the circumstances leading to the infant's death and the subsequent disposal of the body in the Arabian Sea. While the Sessions Court had found the couple guilty of murder and evidence disposal, it acquitted them of the grievous hurt charge.

The defense's main contention was the lack of knowledge about the infant's life at the time of disposal. The couple argued that they believed their child was already deceased, a point the prosecution contested. However, after evaluating the evidence and witness testimonies, the High Court found insufficient proof that the accused knew the child was alive when disposing of the body.

Referencing legal precedents and Section 299 of the IPC, the court concluded that an act performed on a body believed to be lifeless does not constitute culpable homicide. This interpretation was crucial in the decision to set aside the convictions.

As a result of this judgment, the accused couple was acquitted of all charges and ordered to be released forthwith, unless required in connection with any other case. This decision not only brings relief to the accused but also marks a significant moment in the legal landscape, addressing complex issues surrounding the interpretation of culpable homicide.

Date of Decision: 22nd November 2023

Bashdev VS State of Kerala Inspector of Police

 

Latest Legal News