Wife Exaggerating Husband's Income In Maintenance Affidavit Is Not Perjury: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Husband's Section 340 Application Candidate Cannot Be Faulted For Missing Disclaimers In Form-26 Supplied By Returning Officer: Bombay High Court Dismissal Without Departmental Enquiry Violates Natural Justice When Criminal Conviction Is Set Aside: Chhattisgarh High Court Orders Reinstatement Cipla MD Gets Relief: Himachal Pradesh HC Quashes Drug Prosecution For Absence of Specific Averment on Day-to-Day Role Mandatory Notice Under Section 106(3) Railways Act Applies To 'Overcharges', Not 'Illegal Charges': Gauhati High Court Insurer Can't Escape Paying Accident Victims Even With Invalid Licence Defence — Avoidance Clause In Policy Seals Liability: Gujarat High Court Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts — Once A Claim Is Founded On Fraud, The Entire Edifice Of The Claim Collapses And No Relief Can Be Granted: Supreme Court Like Cases Must Be Decided Alike": Orissa High Court Directs State To Pay Service Benefits To Deceased Employee's Heirs Claiming Parity Ancient Jain Idol Cannot Remain In Police Custody Under Treasure Trove Act: Allahabad High Court Orders Transfer To Museum Income Tax | Receivables For Warranty Reimbursements Constitute An 'Asset' Under Section 153A For Reopening Assessment: Delhi High Court Married Persons Cannot Claim Police Protection For Live-In Relationships Without First Obtaining Divorce: Allahabad High Court Breach Of Private Compromise Cannot Ipso Facto Trigger Cancellation Of Probation Granted On Legally Sustainable Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Interference Under Article 226 In Eviction Proceedings When Land Compensation Is Deposited In Competent Court: Kerala High Court "Immediately Preceding Three Years" For Land Compensation Must Be Calculated From Date Of Section 11 Notification, Not Calendar Year: Jharkhand High Court Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Attributed To Minor Children; State Strictly Liable For Unsecured Hazardous Reservoirs: J&K High Court Party Seeking Transfer Can't Hide Pending Transfer Petition From High Court: Karnataka HC Quashes Transfer Order Mother Can Represent Muslim Minor As 'Next Friend' In Civil Suit As CPC Provisions Are Secular And Not Tied To Personal Law: Calcutta High Court First Appellate Court Must Frame Points For Determination Under Order XLI Rule 31 CPC, Cannot Remand Cryptically: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Recovery Of Stolen Property Cannot Be Sole Basis For Murder Conviction If Chain Of Circumstances Is Broken: Bombay High Court MP Constable's Shell Company, Rs.6.44 Crore Properties, Ghost Cooperative Society: HC Rejects PMLA Bail of Director Who Had 'No Financial Capability' To Buy What He Bought

High Court Acquits Parents in Infanticide Case: Act on Body Believed Lifeless Does Not Constitute Culpable Homicide

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Kerala High Court today acquitted a couple previously convicted for the murder of their infant daughter. The pivotal legal observation by the Honorable Justices P.B. Suresh Kumar and Johnson John stated, "Act on body believed to be lifeless does not constitute culpable homicide," setting a significant precedent in criminal jurisprudence.

The appellants, Prathibha and Bashdev, were initially convicted by the Additional Sessions Court for offenses under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), pertaining to murder and the disposal of evidence. The case hinged on whether the act of disposing of a body, believed to be lifeless, could attract the offense of culpable homicide.

In the detailed judgment, the High Court meticulously analyzed the circumstances leading to the infant's death and the subsequent disposal of the body in the Arabian Sea. While the Sessions Court had found the couple guilty of murder and evidence disposal, it acquitted them of the grievous hurt charge.

The defense's main contention was the lack of knowledge about the infant's life at the time of disposal. The couple argued that they believed their child was already deceased, a point the prosecution contested. However, after evaluating the evidence and witness testimonies, the High Court found insufficient proof that the accused knew the child was alive when disposing of the body.

Referencing legal precedents and Section 299 of the IPC, the court concluded that an act performed on a body believed to be lifeless does not constitute culpable homicide. This interpretation was crucial in the decision to set aside the convictions.

As a result of this judgment, the accused couple was acquitted of all charges and ordered to be released forthwith, unless required in connection with any other case. This decision not only brings relief to the accused but also marks a significant moment in the legal landscape, addressing complex issues surrounding the interpretation of culpable homicide.

Date of Decision: 22nd November 2023

Bashdev VS State of Kerala Inspector of Police

 

Latest Legal News