Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |    

High Court Acquits Parents in Infanticide Case: Act on Body Believed Lifeless Does Not Constitute Culpable Homicide

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Kerala High Court today acquitted a couple previously convicted for the murder of their infant daughter. The pivotal legal observation by the Honorable Justices P.B. Suresh Kumar and Johnson John stated, "Act on body believed to be lifeless does not constitute culpable homicide," setting a significant precedent in criminal jurisprudence.

The appellants, Prathibha and Bashdev, were initially convicted by the Additional Sessions Court for offenses under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), pertaining to murder and the disposal of evidence. The case hinged on whether the act of disposing of a body, believed to be lifeless, could attract the offense of culpable homicide.

In the detailed judgment, the High Court meticulously analyzed the circumstances leading to the infant's death and the subsequent disposal of the body in the Arabian Sea. While the Sessions Court had found the couple guilty of murder and evidence disposal, it acquitted them of the grievous hurt charge.

The defense's main contention was the lack of knowledge about the infant's life at the time of disposal. The couple argued that they believed their child was already deceased, a point the prosecution contested. However, after evaluating the evidence and witness testimonies, the High Court found insufficient proof that the accused knew the child was alive when disposing of the body.

Referencing legal precedents and Section 299 of the IPC, the court concluded that an act performed on a body believed to be lifeless does not constitute culpable homicide. This interpretation was crucial in the decision to set aside the convictions.

As a result of this judgment, the accused couple was acquitted of all charges and ordered to be released forthwith, unless required in connection with any other case. This decision not only brings relief to the accused but also marks a significant moment in the legal landscape, addressing complex issues surrounding the interpretation of culpable homicide.

Date of Decision: 22nd November 2023

Bashdev VS State of Kerala Inspector of Police

 

Similar News