Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court

Dying Declarations Are Paramount in Criminal Jurisprudence, Provided They Are Voluntary and Coherent: Jharkhand High Court Upholds Conviction in Arson Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court Confirms Life Sentence for Amir Mallick; Gudia @ Guria Acquitted Due to Inconsistent Testimonies

In a significant judgment, the Jharkhand High Court upheld the conviction of Amir Mallick in an arson case, reinforcing the critical importance of consistent dying declarations. The bench, comprising Justices Ananda Sen and Subhash Chand, affirmed the life imprisonment sentence for Amir Mallick under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). However, Gudia @ Guria was acquitted, benefiting from inconsistencies in the victim’s dying declarations.

The case revolves around the death of Shabana Parveen, who succumbed to burn injuries on 10th March 2012. The prosecution’s case was primarily built on two dying declarations by the deceased. The first statement was recorded by the police in the presence of a doctor, while the second was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. by a Judicial Magistrate. In both declarations, Shabana Parveen named Amir Mallick as an assailant but omitted Gudia @ Guria in her second statement before the Magistrate.

Credibility of Dying Declarations: The court meticulously examined the dying declarations, underscoring their reliability and consistency. “Dying declarations are paramount in criminal jurisprudence, provided they are voluntary and coherent,” the bench noted. The medical certifications confirming the victim’s fit state of mind during the declarations were crucial in validating their reliability.

Witness Testimonies: Addressing the issue of hostile witnesses, particularly P.W. 1, the husband of the deceased, who did not support the prosecution’s case, the court emphasized the overall evidence’s sufficiency. “Minor discrepancies in witness testimonies do not dilute the prosecution’s case when the core evidence remains intact,” the court stated.

The court extensively discussed the principles guiding the evaluation of dying declarations. It highlighted that a dying declaration could solely ground a conviction if deemed reliable and voluntary. Referring to the Supreme Court’s decision in Purshottam Chopra & Anr. Vs. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) (2020), the bench noted, “The corroboration provided by medical evidence and the presence of a Judicial Magistrate lend substantial credibility to the declarations.”

Justice Ananda Sen remarked, “The consistency and voluntariness of the dying declarations, coupled with medical certifications, leave no room for doubt regarding their veracity.”

The Jharkhand High Court’s judgment underscores the judiciary’s steadfast commitment to upholding justice through rigorous evidence evaluation. By affirming Amir Mallick’s conviction and acquitting Gudia @ Guria, the court reinforced the legal framework governing dying declarations. This landmark decision is expected to significantly influence future cases, emphasizing the importance of consistent and reliable victim statements.

 

Date of Decision: 24th May 2024

Amir Mallick VS The State of Jharkhand

Similar News