Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Discovery of Fact Must Distinctly Relate to the Accused’s Information To Admissible U/ S 27 Evidence Act: Supreme Court in Murder Case Acquittal

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court of India, led by Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, acquitted the appellants in the criminal appeal nos. 3869 of 2023 and 2740 of 2023, overturning their earlier conviction in a murder case.

The apex court’s decision hinged on the interpretation and application of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, focusing on whether the recovered evidence distinctly related to the information provided by the accused.

The case involved the conviction of the appellants for murder based on circumstantial evidence and memorandum statements under Section 27, which led to the discovery of a body. The judgment scrutinized the link between these statements and the actual discovery of the body.

Witness Testimony Inconsistencies: The Court highlighted discrepancies in the testimonies regarding the body’s discovery, suggesting knowledge of the murder prior to the statements recorded under Section 27.

Application of Section 27 of the Evidence Act: The judgment underscored the inadequacy of evidence connecting the discovery of the body directly to the appellants’ information, casting doubt on the prosecution’s reliance on Section 27.

Necessity for a Complete Chain of Circumstances: Emphasizing the need for an unbroken chain of circumstances, the Court found the prosecution failed to establish a sequence leading conclusively to the appellants’ guilt.

Decision: The Supreme Court reversed the decisions of the High Court and Trial Court, acquitting the appellants. The Court stressed the critical nature of linking the discovery of a fact directly and distinctly to the information provided by the accused in cases built on circumstantial evidence.

Date of Decision: April 10, 2024.

Ravishankar Tandon vs. State of Chhattisgarh,

 

Similar News