Allegations In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Specific And Supported By Foundation Facts To Avoid Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Sentence To Period Already Undergone Citing Medical Condition And Expression Of Remorse Qualification Of '10+2 System' Cannot Be Equated With Other Certifications Absent An Equivalence Clause: Supreme Court Essential Qualifications In Recruitment Cannot Be Diluted Or Subject To Judicial Equivalence: Supreme Court Court Has Discretion To Decide Genuineness Of Signature By Comparison; Not Essential To Invoke Expert Opinion In All Cases: Supreme Court Civil Disputes Cannot Be Converted Into Criminal Offences To Recover Money: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Under Section 420 IPC Taxing Authorities Must Classify Goods Based On Form At Time Of Sale, Not End Use: Supreme Court Suit For Declaration Of Status Must Seek Consequential Relief To Avoid Bar Of Proviso: Allahabad High Court Illegal Detention | Police Failure To Maintain CCTV Footage Invokes Adverse Presumption Under Sec 119 BSA Against State: Allahabad High Court Section 138 NI Act | Accused Rebuts Presumption By Proving Intimation Of Misplaced Cheque To Bank And Lack Of Documentation For Alleged Settlement: Andhra Pradesh High Court Garnishee Proceedings Under CPC | Disputed Debt Cannot Be Summarily Adjudicated Without Leading Evidence: Bombay High Court Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022 | Magistrate’s Power Under Section 5 To Direct DNA Profiling Is Not Conditional Upon Consent: Calcutta High Court Conviction Based On 'Assumption And Presumption' Cannot Be Sustained: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Limitation Act | Suit For Specific Performance Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time Even If No Date For Performance Is Fixed: Delhi High Court Enrolment As Advocate | Bar Council Must Consider 'Equivalent Qualifications' Under Rule 4(a) Rules Of Legal Education: Karnataka High Court Section 482 BNSS | Pre-Arrest Bail Is Not A Matter Of Course; Must Show Special Case For Invoking Extraordinary Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Hindu Succession Act | A Co-parcener Cannot Alienate Entire Property; Non-Impleaded Legal Heir Not Bound By Previous Decree: Madras High Court Purchaser During Pendency Of Suit Bound By Compromise Decree, Cannot Treat It As Void In Collateral Proceedings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC | In Partition Suits, Defendants Asserting A Share Can Seek Transposition If Original Plaintiffs Withdraw: Patna High Court Section 69 BNS | Suppression Of Subsisting Marriage Or Live-In Relationship During Marriage Proposal Constitutes 'Deceitful Means': Kerala High Court Anticipatory Bail | Mere Apprehension Of Investigating Agency Is Insufficient To Deny Bail Without Demonstrating Necessity Of Custodial Interrogation: Telangana High Court Income Tax Evasion | Criminal Prosecution Under Section 276C IT Act Cannot Sustain Once Foundation Assessment Order Is Set Aside: Punjab & Haryana High Court Election Petition Must Be Presented By Petitioner In Person, Non-Compliance Renders It Liable To Summary Dismissal: Supreme Court Absence Of Recovery Or Evidence Of Stolen Property Precludes Conviction Under Section 394 IPC: Supreme Court

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition on Alleged Manipulation of JEE Score Cards

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a recent judgment delivered on June 3, 2024, dismissed the writ petition filed by Vibhuti Negi against the National Testing Agency (NTA). The petitioner alleged discrepancies in her Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) scorecards, claiming that the NTA had uploaded two different response sheets and scorecards for her, causing confusion and alleged manipulation. Justice C. Hari Shankar, while delivering the judgment, highlighted the absence of a prima facie case and underscored the technical robustness of the NTA’s examination process.

Vibhuti Negi, the petitioner, appeared for the JEE, a highly competitive exam conducted by the NTA for admissions into prestigious engineering institutions such as the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs). According to the petitioner, two response sheets and scorecards were uploaded by the NTA, leading to significantly different results. The first scorecard showed a percentile of 99.8493935, while the second reflected a significantly lower score of 74.5733907. The petitioner sought the quashing of the second response sheet and scorecard, alleging they were incorrect and did not pertain to her.

The court noted the NTA's assertion that the first response sheet and scorecard presented by the petitioner were fabricated. The NTA explained that their examination process is highly secure, relying on computer-based tests with no human interface, thus minimizing the chance of errors or manipulation.

Justice Shankar critically analyzed the evidence provided by both parties. He found significant inconsistencies in the petitioner’s claims, particularly the discrepancies in the application numbers and QR codes on the purportedly correct scorecards. The court pointed out that the petitioner's application number was incorrect on the first scorecard, and the QR code redirected to a Wikipedia page, further casting doubt on its authenticity.

The court reiterated the principle that while it is within the writ court's jurisdiction to adjudicate disputed facts, such intervention must be sparingly exercised and only when the facts are unequivocally clear. The court found no compelling reason to deviate from this principle in this case, given the strong evidence presented by the NTA supporting the integrity of the second response sheet and scorecard.

Justice Shankar emphasized, "There is no prima facie case that persuades this court to accept the petitioner's assertion that the first scorecard and response sheet should be deemed correct. The integrity of the NTA's examination process is robust and reliable."

The Delhi High Court’s judgment underscores the judiciary's reliance on the technical and procedural robustness of standardized testing agencies like the NTA. By dismissing the petition, the court has reinforced the reliability of the NTA’s examination processes and sent a clear message about the judicial scrutiny applied to allegations of manipulation and fabrication in high-stakes educational assessments.

 

Date of Decision: June 3, 2024

Vibhuti Negi v. National Testing Agency & Anr

 

Latest Legal News