Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Courts Must Consider Mental Agony and Trauma of Rape Victims: Gujarat High Court in Pregnancy Termination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Gujarat High Court, in a groundbreaking judgement in the R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 15350 of 2023, has underscored the critical importance of considering the mental agony and trauma experienced by rape victims when deliberating on cases of medical termination of pregnancy. The ruling, made by Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas, marks a significant precedent in the context of women’s reproductive rights and the legal system’s sensitivity to the plight of rape survivors.

In this particular case, a minor victim, about 16 years old, sought legal authorization to terminate her pregnancy resulting from a rape incident. The case was challenging, as the pregnancy had progressed to 27 weeks and 04 days. The Court, in its observation, highlighted, “the anguish caused by the pregnancy is presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the woman.” This statement is pivotal as it recognizes the profound impact of sexual assault on a victim’s mental well-being.

The Court’s decision was influenced by a comprehensive medical report from the Civil Hospital, Bhavnagar, and guided by precedents set by the Supreme Court in similar contexts. The judgement also referenced the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Amendment Act, 2021, which provides guidelines for the termination of pregnancies under special circumstances.

In its landmark ruling, the Court granted permission for the pregnancy’s termination, emphasizing the victim’s autonomy and mental health. It also provided detailed instructions for the procedure, prioritizing the victim’s safety and health. Additionally, the Court directed that in the event the baby is born alive, the State and its agencies are to take full responsibility, aligning with the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2005.

Date: 22/11/2023

XYZ VS  STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News