Gratuity Is a Property Right, Not a Charity: MP High Court Upholds Gratuity Claims of Long-Term Contract Workers Seized Vehicles Must Not Be Left to Rot in Open Yards: Madras High Court Invokes Article 21, Orders Release of Vehicle Seized in Illegal Quarrying Case Even After Talaq And A Settlement, A Divorced Muslim Woman Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CRPC: Kerala High Court Bail Cannot Be Withheld as Punishment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Govt Official in ₹200 Cr. Scholarship Scam Citing Delay and Article 21 Violation Custodial Interrogation Necessary in Serious Economic Offences: Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹1.91 Cr Housing Scam Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable Sanction to Prosecute Under UAPA Cannot Be a Mechanical Act: Supreme Court Quashes Jharkhand Government’s Third-Time Sanction Without New Evidence FIRs in Corruption Cases Cannot Be Quashed on Hyper-Technical Grounds of Police Station Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ACB Investigations Quashed by Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Completion of Ayurvedic Nursing Training Does Not Confer Right to Appointment: Supreme Court Rejects Legitimate Expectation Claim by Trainees University’s Error Can’t Cost a Student Her Future: Supreme Court Directs Manav Bharti University to Issue Withheld Degree and Marksheets Due to Clerical Mistake Disciplinary Exoneration Cannot Shield Public Servant from Criminal Trial in Corruption Cases: Supreme Court Customs Tariff Act | ‘End Use’ and ‘Common Parlance’ Tests Cannot Override Statutory Context: Supreme Court Classifies Mushroom Shelves as ‘Aluminium Structures’ Supreme Court Allows PIL Against Limited Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers to Continue Under New Social Security Code Liberty Cannot Wait for Endless Trials: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Wadhawan Brothers in ₹57,000 Crore DHFL Scam Co-Sharer Has Superior Right of Pre-emption Even If Land Is Gair Mumkin Bara: Punjab & Haryana High Court Neighbours Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC Merely For Alleged Instigation: Karnataka High Court No Party Has a Right to Demand a Local Commissioner — It's Purely the Court’s Discretion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Civil Revision

Courts Must Consider Mental Agony and Trauma of Rape Victims: Gujarat High Court in Pregnancy Termination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Gujarat High Court, in a groundbreaking judgement in the R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 15350 of 2023, has underscored the critical importance of considering the mental agony and trauma experienced by rape victims when deliberating on cases of medical termination of pregnancy. The ruling, made by Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas, marks a significant precedent in the context of women’s reproductive rights and the legal system’s sensitivity to the plight of rape survivors.

In this particular case, a minor victim, about 16 years old, sought legal authorization to terminate her pregnancy resulting from a rape incident. The case was challenging, as the pregnancy had progressed to 27 weeks and 04 days. The Court, in its observation, highlighted, “the anguish caused by the pregnancy is presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the woman.” This statement is pivotal as it recognizes the profound impact of sexual assault on a victim’s mental well-being.

The Court’s decision was influenced by a comprehensive medical report from the Civil Hospital, Bhavnagar, and guided by precedents set by the Supreme Court in similar contexts. The judgement also referenced the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Amendment Act, 2021, which provides guidelines for the termination of pregnancies under special circumstances.

In its landmark ruling, the Court granted permission for the pregnancy’s termination, emphasizing the victim’s autonomy and mental health. It also provided detailed instructions for the procedure, prioritizing the victim’s safety and health. Additionally, the Court directed that in the event the baby is born alive, the State and its agencies are to take full responsibility, aligning with the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2005.

Date: 22/11/2023

XYZ VS  STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News