MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Courts Must Consider Mental Agony and Trauma of Rape Victims: Gujarat High Court in Pregnancy Termination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Gujarat High Court, in a groundbreaking judgement in the R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 15350 of 2023, has underscored the critical importance of considering the mental agony and trauma experienced by rape victims when deliberating on cases of medical termination of pregnancy. The ruling, made by Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas, marks a significant precedent in the context of women’s reproductive rights and the legal system’s sensitivity to the plight of rape survivors.

In this particular case, a minor victim, about 16 years old, sought legal authorization to terminate her pregnancy resulting from a rape incident. The case was challenging, as the pregnancy had progressed to 27 weeks and 04 days. The Court, in its observation, highlighted, “the anguish caused by the pregnancy is presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the woman.” This statement is pivotal as it recognizes the profound impact of sexual assault on a victim’s mental well-being.

The Court’s decision was influenced by a comprehensive medical report from the Civil Hospital, Bhavnagar, and guided by precedents set by the Supreme Court in similar contexts. The judgement also referenced the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Amendment Act, 2021, which provides guidelines for the termination of pregnancies under special circumstances.

In its landmark ruling, the Court granted permission for the pregnancy’s termination, emphasizing the victim’s autonomy and mental health. It also provided detailed instructions for the procedure, prioritizing the victim’s safety and health. Additionally, the Court directed that in the event the baby is born alive, the State and its agencies are to take full responsibility, aligning with the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2005.

Date: 22/11/2023

XYZ VS  STATE OF GUJARAT

Similar News