Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Courts Must Consider Mental Agony and Trauma of Rape Victims: Gujarat High Court in Pregnancy Termination Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Gujarat High Court, in a groundbreaking judgement in the R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 15350 of 2023, has underscored the critical importance of considering the mental agony and trauma experienced by rape victims when deliberating on cases of medical termination of pregnancy. The ruling, made by Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas, marks a significant precedent in the context of women’s reproductive rights and the legal system’s sensitivity to the plight of rape survivors.

In this particular case, a minor victim, about 16 years old, sought legal authorization to terminate her pregnancy resulting from a rape incident. The case was challenging, as the pregnancy had progressed to 27 weeks and 04 days. The Court, in its observation, highlighted, “the anguish caused by the pregnancy is presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the woman.” This statement is pivotal as it recognizes the profound impact of sexual assault on a victim’s mental well-being.

The Court’s decision was influenced by a comprehensive medical report from the Civil Hospital, Bhavnagar, and guided by precedents set by the Supreme Court in similar contexts. The judgement also referenced the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Amendment Act, 2021, which provides guidelines for the termination of pregnancies under special circumstances.

In its landmark ruling, the Court granted permission for the pregnancy’s termination, emphasizing the victim’s autonomy and mental health. It also provided detailed instructions for the procedure, prioritizing the victim’s safety and health. Additionally, the Court directed that in the event the baby is born alive, the State and its agencies are to take full responsibility, aligning with the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2005.

Date: 22/11/2023

XYZ VS  STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News