Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

CBI Probe against Judicial Officer and Advocate Bathinda: Legal System Can't Afford Self-Inflicted Scars: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant Order , Punjab and Haryana High Court has ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take over the investigation in a high-stakes case involving land mafia and abuse of legal process involving Judicial Officer and Advocate. The case originally stemmed from a land dispute but took an "alarming turn" as the legal process was exploited.

The case initially seemed to be one of a "common species" involving a land dispute but soon took an "alarming turn." Accusations were raised that the process of law was being abused to favor illegal designs. The inconsistency in the stance of the original investigating agency added further complexity, calling the credibility of the system into question.

The matter involves a judicial officer who, despite his obligation to remain impartial, allegedly favored the prosecution. Further, an advocate is accused of submitting forged evidence, thereby abusing the legal process. The case initially started as a dispute over a property but later revealed serious procedural irregularities.

The Court had strong words about the role played by the judicial officer and the advocate in abusing the legal process. "Misconduct of such caliber undermines the very edifice upon which the judicial system stands," noted the judgment.

High Court emphasized the need for an "unimpaired and unobstructed investigation," stating, "The trust of the litigants in the system doesn't get eroded."

Relying on earlier verdicts, the High Court highlighted its obligation to protect the fundamental rights of citizens. "This extraordinary power must be exercised sparingly, cautiously and in exceptional situations," it cited from its judgment.

The CBI has been directed to "conclude the investigation expeditiously, preferably within six months," and the Trial Court has been instructed not to proceed further with the case until the investigation is complete.

The Court also dismissed applications for impleadment and transfer of investigation filed by the accused, reiterating that the accused have "no locus" in the transfer of investigation.

The judgment has set a strong precedent by emphasizing the significance of an unbiased investigation to uphold the integrity of the judicial system. The order is reportable and reasoned, likely to impact future cases involving abuse of legal procedures.

 Date of Decision: 18 October  2023

Guru Nanak Vidya Bhandar Trust VS State of Punjab and others

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20_Oct_23_Guru_Nanak_Vidya_Bhandar_Trust__Daryaganj__New_Delhi_v__State_of_Punjab_and_others.pdf"]

Similar News