High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

“Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Probationary Judicial Officer, Declines to Entertain Appeal”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the termination of a probationary Judicial Officer, Radha Tiwari, against the State of Uttar Pradesh & Others. The apex court “declined to entertain the Appeal” and stated that “the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissing the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be interfered with.”

Radha Tiwari, the appellant in this case, had been terminated from her service in the U P Nyayik Seva without confirmation. The court observed that “there is no provision for deemed confirmation” in the case. The Supreme Court pointed out that the High Court was within its rights to terminate the appellant’s service. “Though Departmental Enquiries were initiated against the appellant, the High Court, in a considered view, decided not to proceed with the enquiries and to discharge the services of the appellant by an order of discharge simpliciter,” the Supreme Court said in its order.

The three-judge bench comprising Hon’ble The Chief Justice, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra found no merit in interfering with the High Court’s decision. “On these facts, bearing in mind the settled position in law,” the court decided to dismiss the appeal.

The decision serves as a significant precedent for future cases involving the termination of probationary officers in various departments. It also underlines the apex court’s position that the High Court’s decisions, especially on matters related to service termination, must be respected unless there are compelling reasons to interfere.

Date of Decision: September 13, 2023

Radha Tiwari vs The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors     

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Radha_Tiwari_vs_The_State_Of_Uttar_Pradesh_on_13_September_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News