Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

“Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Probationary Judicial Officer, Declines to Entertain Appeal”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the termination of a probationary Judicial Officer, Radha Tiwari, against the State of Uttar Pradesh & Others. The apex court “declined to entertain the Appeal” and stated that “the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissing the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be interfered with.”

Radha Tiwari, the appellant in this case, had been terminated from her service in the U P Nyayik Seva without confirmation. The court observed that “there is no provision for deemed confirmation” in the case. The Supreme Court pointed out that the High Court was within its rights to terminate the appellant’s service. “Though Departmental Enquiries were initiated against the appellant, the High Court, in a considered view, decided not to proceed with the enquiries and to discharge the services of the appellant by an order of discharge simpliciter,” the Supreme Court said in its order.

The three-judge bench comprising Hon’ble The Chief Justice, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra found no merit in interfering with the High Court’s decision. “On these facts, bearing in mind the settled position in law,” the court decided to dismiss the appeal.

The decision serves as a significant precedent for future cases involving the termination of probationary officers in various departments. It also underlines the apex court’s position that the High Court’s decisions, especially on matters related to service termination, must be respected unless there are compelling reasons to interfere.

Date of Decision: September 13, 2023

Radha Tiwari vs The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors     

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Radha_Tiwari_vs_The_State_Of_Uttar_Pradesh_on_13_September_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News