Criminal Procedure - Maintenance - Section 125 CrPC - Petition challenging maintenance granted to wife after 13 years of compromise and lump sum alimony - Held, petition under Section 125 CrPC justified to maintain wife and daughter for a respectable life - Filing of maintenance petition not misuse of process of law - Petition dismissed. [Para 14]

Financial Condition and Employment - Analysis - Held, despite receiving lump sum alimony and working as a teacher, wife's income insufficient to meet responsibilities - Daughter's education expenses and lack of sufficient movable or immovable property considered - Maintenance awarded justified. [Para 15]

Decision - Dismissal of Petition - High Court upholds maintenance order of Rs. 15,000 per month granted by the Additional Sessions Judge - Petition dismissed. [Para 17-18]

Service Law - Regular Appointment - Delay in Verification - Writ petition for regular appointment benefits from date of appointment - Petitioner appointed as PGT Home Science on regular basis, but benefits not given due to delay in experience certificate verification - Held, petitioner entitled to benefits of regular employee - Delay attributable to Department, not petitioner - Petitioner to be treated as regular incumbent from date of appointment with all consequential benefits, including salary arrears and seniority. [Paras 12-14]

Departmental Negligence - Analysis - Held, delay in verification due to Department’s inaction cannot prejudice petitioner - Petitioner continuously working since appointment and verified to have requisite qualifications and experience - Benefits denied only due to departmental negligence. [Para 10]

Decision - Grant of Benefits and Interest - High Court directs respondents to treat petitioner as regular employee from date of appointment - Regular salary, arrears, and interest at 6% per annum awarded - Costs imposed on responsible officer. [Paras 14-17]

Negotiable Instruments Act - Quashing of FIR - Complaint case under Section 138 NI Act - Petitioner declared proclaimed offender for non-appearance; FIR registered under Section 174-A IPC - Main dispute settled via compromise - Held, continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC post-compromise is abuse of process of law - FIR and all subsequent proceedings quashed. [Para 13]

Main Dispute Settlement - Effect on FIR under Section 174-A IPC - Analysis - Held, once the main petition under Section 138 NI Act stands withdrawn due to compromise, continuation of FIR under Section 174-A IPC serves no purpose - FIR registered solely due to non-appearance in the main case, which has been resolved. [Paras 9-10]

Decision - Quashing of FIR and Proceedings - High Court quashes FIR and subsequent proceedings under Section 174-A IPC in light of the settled main dispute - Petition allowed. [Para 15]

Landlord-Tenant Law - Eviction for Bona Fide Requirement - Revision petition by tenant against eviction - Landlord sought eviction for personal use of premises for office, workshop, and training room - Held, bona fide requirement established as landlord had no other suitable premises in the urban area - Terms 'possession' and 'occupation' are distinct; mere possession does not disqualify landlord from seeking eviction - Eviction on grounds of bona fide necessity upheld. [Paras 8-12]

Dilapidated Condition of Premises - Expert Testimony - Analysis - Held, eviction on grounds of dilapidated condition based on Building Expert's report not sustainable as expert did not face cross-examination - Findings of authorities below on this ground set aside. [Para 3]

Decision - Partial Allowance of Petition - High Court upholds eviction on the ground of bona fide necessity but sets aside eviction on the ground of dilapidated condition of the premises - Petition partly allowed. [Paras 13-14]

Service Law - Regularization of Employment - Notification Applicability - Appeal challenging regularization of a part-time employee dismissed - Suit filed for regularization of services as Sweeper-cum-Chowkidar based on Haryana Government Notification dated 01.10.2003 - Both lower courts found the plaintiff eligible under the notification as he was appointed against a sanctioned post and served dual functions for over 15 years - Appeal dismissed for lack of merit, with the High Court upholding the lower courts' findings. [Paras 1-12]

Regularization of Part-Time Employees - Criteria under Government Notification - Analysis - Held - Plaintiff served dual roles as Sweeper during the day and Chowkidar at night, falling within the purview of the Haryana Government's regularization policy for contractual and adhoc employees with over three years of service - Notification aimed at employees completing three years of uninterrupted service by 30.09.2003, which the plaintiff satisfied. [Paras 7, 10]

Decision - Dismissal of Appeal - High Court finds no merit in the appeal - Plaintiff's appointment against a sanctioned post and continuous dual service for 15 years substantiates his regularization under the relevant government notification - Appeal dismissed. [Paras 11-12]

Locus Standi - Disciplinary Proceedings - Writ of Quo Warranto - Petition by a third party challenging the order of the Chancellor of the University dropping disciplinary proceedings against a professor - Held, the petitioner, being a stranger to the disciplinary proceedings, has no locus standi to question the order - Writ of quo warranto not maintainable for challenging orders of a statutory authority - Petition dismissed with costs. [Para 7]

Power of the Chancellor - University Act Provisions - Analysis - Held, the Chancellor of the University has special and residual powers under Sections 13(13) and 13(14) of the University Act, including the power to annul proceedings of the University not in conformity with the Act - Chancellor’s decision to drop disciplinary proceedings based on the facts and lack of evidence against the professor upheld. [Para 10]

Decision - Dismissal of Petition - High Court dismisses the writ petition for lack of locus standi and maintains the Chancellor’s order - Petitioner ordered to pay costs of Rs. 15,000 to the Poor Patient Welfare Fund, PGI, Chandigarh. [Para 14]

Criminal Procedure - Alteration and Addition of Charges - Power of Court - Petition challenging the trial court's order allowing the prosecution's application for amending the charge sheet - Held, the trial court has the power to alter or add charges at any time before the judgment is pronounced, but this power should not be used to create a totally new case - Amendment of charge sheet must be based on new evidence and not merely to correct mistakes in the original charge sheet - Petition allowed, impugned order quashed. [Paras 7-12]

Power of Amendment and Addition of Charges - Analysis - Held, Section 216 Cr.P.C. empowers the court to alter or add charges but does not allow making out a new case entirely - Such power should be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily - Amendment based on prosecution's claim of mistake without new evidence is not justified. [Para 9]

Decision - Quashing of Impugned Order - High Court quashes the trial court's order allowing amendment of charge sheet as it was not based on new evidence and altered the foundation of the case - Petition allowed. [Paras 12-13]

Unaided Educational Institutions - Disciplinary Procedures - Judicial Review - Employment Termination

Unaided Educational Institutions - Disciplinary Procedures – Letters patent appeals concerning termination of employees from an unaided educational institution – Held: The Haryana School Education Rules, 2003, provide a detailed disciplinary procedure for unaided educational institutions. Major penalties can only be imposed following an enquiry and with the approval of the Managing Committee. Failure to follow these procedures invalidates the termination. [Paras 16, 19, 20]

Natural Justice - Termination of Employment – Analysis – Held: Termination of employees without providing a fair hearing and not following the prescribed disciplinary procedures violates principles of natural justice. Employers must adhere to the notice period stipulated in the employment contract and conduct a proper enquiry before terminating services. [Paras 13, 24]

Compensation vs. Reinstatement – Consideration – Held: While reinstatement is a typical remedy for wrongful termination, courts can award compensation instead, especially where reinstatement is impractical due to strained relations between the parties. Compensation is calculated based on the employee's salary and tenure. [Paras 26-29]

Criminal Procedure - Regular Bail - Section 153-A IPC - Petition for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Accused allegedly wore a T-shirt with a picture of Jagdish Tytler and words "HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO OUR BELOVED GOD FATHER" - Held, mere wearing of such a T-shirt does not constitute an incriminating material or provocative act under Section 153-A IPC - No prima facie case made out - Petition allowed, bail granted. [Paras 19-25]

Mens Rea and Provocative Act - Analysis - Held, for an offence under Section 153-A IPC, the prosecution must establish intent to promote enmity or hatred between different groups - No evidence of such intent or any provocative act by the petitioner - Petitioner's role as General Secretary of SC/ST Cell of Punjab Pardesh Congress Committee considered. [Para 20]

Decision - Grant of Bail - High Court grants regular bail to the petitioner due to lack of incriminating evidence and absence of mens rea - Conditions imposed for bail include surrendering passport, weekly appearance before the Investigating Officer, and no influence on witnesses. [Paras 24-25]