(1)
NARESH KUMAR ...APPELLANT
RAMESH KUMAR @ RAJ ...APPELLANT
PAWAN KUMAR ...APPELLANT Vs.
THE STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT
THE STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT
THE STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT D.D
30/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law - Dacoity - Requirement of Five or More Persons - Appeals against convictions under Sections 395 and 397 IPC - Accused convicted for dacoity by trial court despite being less than five persons - Held, conviction for dacoity requires five or more persons as per Section 391 IPC - Conviction of less than five persons for dacoity erroneous - Convictions set aside. [Paras 11, 13, 17]
&n...
(2)
MOHAN SINGH AND ANOTHER ...APPELLANTS Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT D.D
30/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law - Dacoity - Unexplained Delay in Sending Recovered Weapons for Testing - Appeals against convictions for preparation and assembly for dacoity - Unexplained delay in sending recovered weapons for testing and absence of test firing - Raises doubts about prosecution's case - Held, weapons not sealed at recovery site and parcels prepared later, casting suspicion on prosecution - Appea...
(3)
ANITA AND OTHERS ...APPELLANTS Vs.
IQBAL AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS D.D
30/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Motor Vehicles Act - Quantum of Compensation - Enhancement - Appeal challenging the awarded compensation for death of a minor child - Held, notional income of deceased child taken as Rs. 30,000/- per annum with a multiplier of 16 as per Sarla Verma case - Compensation for loss of dependency fixed at Rs. 4,80,000/- - Additional Rs. 44,000/- each awarded to parents for loss of consortium - Enhanced ...
(4)
SAURABH VERMA ...Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent D.D
30/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Procedure – Quashing of FIR – Non-Cognizable Offense – Public Gambling Act – Investigation without Magistrate’s Permission – Petition for quashing of FIR under Section 13-A of the Public Gambling Act – FIR related to recovery of Rs. 1,23,50,000/- alleged to be gambling money – Held that investigation of non-cognizable offense without Magistr...
(5)
VIJAY KUMAR …Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …Respondents D.D
30/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Service Law - Dismissal from Service - Requirement of Regular Inquiry – Held, the punishment of dismissal from service can be inflicted for good and sufficient reasons only after a regular inquiry in terms of Rule 8 of the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1970 has been held. The petitioner had not concealed his qualifications at the time of initial engagement or subsequ...
(6)
DARSHAN KAUR ...PETITIONER Vs.
SATNAM SINGH ...RESPONDENT D.D
29/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Evidence Law - Secondary Evidence - Quashing of Order - Petition to quash order dismissing application for leading secondary evidence - Original documents produced in preliminary stage untraceable due to office shifting - Held, petitioner genuinely unable to produce original documents - Permitted to adduce secondary evidence as per exceptions under Sections 65 and 66 of the Indian Evidence Act - P...
(7)
JEET BEIN ALIAS JEEWAN AND OTHERS ...APPELLANTS Vs.
AJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS D.D
29/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Motor Vehicles Act - Quantum of Compensation - Enhancement - Appeals challenging the awarded compensation for death of a 55-year-old in a vehicular accident - Held, compensation enhanced considering future prospects, loss of consortium, and updated multiplier - Enhanced compensation awarded. [Paras 10-14]
Violation of Insurance Policy Terms - Goods Carriage Vehicle - Route Permit - Gr...
(8)
SHUBHAM ALIAS SHUBHAM SAINI ...PETITIONER Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT D.D
29/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Offence under Section 188 IPC - Petition to quash FIR on grounds that police registered it without written complaint from public servant - Held, Section 195 CrPC requires written complaint from public servant to take cognizance of offences under Section 188 IPC - FIR registered by police without such complaint is void ab initio - FIR and subsequent proceeding...
(9)
KAKA SINGH ...PETITIONER Vs.
PAL SINGH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS D.D
24/11/2022
HIGH COURTS
Additional Evidence - Scope and Permissibility - Revision petition against the First Appellate Court’s order allowing additional evidence - Held, additional evidence permissible under Order XLI, Rule 27(b) CPC if necessary for pronouncing judgment - First Appellate Court correctly allowed mutation record as it was critical to determine the coparcenary nature of the property - Revision petiti...