Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Upholds Second Proceedings Under Collection of Statistics Act: “Statistical Data Vital for Economic Policy-Making”: Karnataka HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Karnataka, headed by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, upheld the validity of the second proceedings under the Collection of Statistics Act, 2008, against M/S. Masturlal (Pvt.) Ltd. The court dismissed the petitioner’s claim of double jeopardy and emphasized the paramount importance of statistical data for economic policy-making.

The case pertained to the petitioner’s failure to furnish required statistical data to the Government of India’s National Sample Survey Office, thus violating Section 15(1) of the Collection of Statistics Act, 2008. In a previous proceeding, the petitioner had pleaded guilty, paid a fine, and the case was closed.

However, the respondent initiated a second proceeding under Section 15(2) of the Act, as the petitioner failed to furnish the necessary data even after the first conviction. The petitioner contended that this amounted to double jeopardy, as they were being vexed twice for the same offense.

Justice M. Nagaprasanna firmly rejected the double jeopardy claim, asserting that the second proceeding under Section 15(2) operates distinctly from the earlier conviction under Section 15(1). The court stressed that statistical data plays a pivotal role in economic policy-making and is crucial for meeting challenges posed by globalization and liberalization.

“The Act’s rigorous provisions aim to ensure diligent submission of statistical data, which forms the backbone of economic planning and policy formulation for the nation,” stated Justice Nagaprasanna in the judgment.

Furthermore, the court directed the concerned court to conclude the proceedings expeditiously and within six months from the receipt of the order.

This ruling reinforces the significance of adhering to statutory requirements in providing accurate statistical data, as it has far-reaching implications on economic development and international compliances.

Date of Decision: 28th July 2023

M/S. MASTURLAL (PVT.) LTD. vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/M_S_Masturlal_Pvt_Ltd_vs_Government_Of_India_on_28_July_2023_Karnt.HC_.pdf"]

Latest Legal News