Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Upholds Second Proceedings Under Collection of Statistics Act: “Statistical Data Vital for Economic Policy-Making”: Karnataka HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Karnataka, headed by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, upheld the validity of the second proceedings under the Collection of Statistics Act, 2008, against M/S. Masturlal (Pvt.) Ltd. The court dismissed the petitioner’s claim of double jeopardy and emphasized the paramount importance of statistical data for economic policy-making.

The case pertained to the petitioner’s failure to furnish required statistical data to the Government of India’s National Sample Survey Office, thus violating Section 15(1) of the Collection of Statistics Act, 2008. In a previous proceeding, the petitioner had pleaded guilty, paid a fine, and the case was closed.

However, the respondent initiated a second proceeding under Section 15(2) of the Act, as the petitioner failed to furnish the necessary data even after the first conviction. The petitioner contended that this amounted to double jeopardy, as they were being vexed twice for the same offense.

Justice M. Nagaprasanna firmly rejected the double jeopardy claim, asserting that the second proceeding under Section 15(2) operates distinctly from the earlier conviction under Section 15(1). The court stressed that statistical data plays a pivotal role in economic policy-making and is crucial for meeting challenges posed by globalization and liberalization.

“The Act’s rigorous provisions aim to ensure diligent submission of statistical data, which forms the backbone of economic planning and policy formulation for the nation,” stated Justice Nagaprasanna in the judgment.

Furthermore, the court directed the concerned court to conclude the proceedings expeditiously and within six months from the receipt of the order.

This ruling reinforces the significance of adhering to statutory requirements in providing accurate statistical data, as it has far-reaching implications on economic development and international compliances.

Date of Decision: 28th July 2023

M/S. MASTURLAL (PVT.) LTD. vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/M_S_Masturlal_Pvt_Ltd_vs_Government_Of_India_on_28_July_2023_Karnt.HC_.pdf"]

Latest Legal News