Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Upholds Expressway Construction: Public Interest Paramount Over Private Concerns: Hyderabad High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Hyderabad High Court has upheld the construction of an expressway extension and flyover, dismissing a writ petition that challenged the project. The court, in its judgment, emphasized the paramount importance of public interest in infrastructure development and the need to balance it against individual concerns.

In its observations, the court stated, "The government has the responsibility to act in tune with the growing requirements and take steps to provide the road and other facilities to the inhabitants of the city." It further added, "In case of a conflict between public interest and individual interest, public interest will outweigh the personal interest."

The petitioners had raised objections to the construction, alleging violations of rules and procedures in road widening and construction. However, the court noted that the petitioners' legal rights had not been affected, and the earlier dismissal of similar petitions had already attained finality.

The court also referred to the principles laid out in the case of Jayabheri Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, which highlighted the need to consider the viability of road alignments in ecologically sensitive zones while balancing public interest and individual landowners' interests.

This ruling underscores the significance of infrastructure development for the city's growth and serves as a reminder of the courts' limited jurisdiction in the absence of legal infirmities and mala fide actions by the authorities.

The judgment reaffirms the courts' commitment to uphold projects that serve the larger public interest while acknowledging the need to protect the environment and preserve water bodies in the area.

The decision has implications for similar cases involving infrastructure development across the region, as it sets a precedent for weighing public welfare against individual grievances in matters of urban planning and development.

Date of Decision: 1 November 2023

Mr. Srikanth V J Tanikella VS The State Of Telangana  

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/THC-01-Nov-23-Mr_Srikanth_V_J_Tanikella_vs_The_State_Of_Telangana.pdf"]

Latest Legal News