Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

"Unfair for the Market Committee to Insist upon Fresh Lease Deed": High Court Rules in Favor of Siya Ram Apple Merchants

05 September 2024 6:10 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision by the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana, the insistence of the State Agricultural Marketing Board for a fresh lease or rent deed for the renewal of commission agent licenses has been questioned. The court, while hearing the case of M/s Siya Ram Apple Merchants, stated, "It goes without saying that even in case some time period of tenancy is prescribed in any rent deed but the tenant continues to occupy the premises even beyond the expiry of the stipulated period, he would assume the character of a statutory tenant."

M/s Siya Ram Apple Merchants had approached the court, contesting letters from the respondents which demanded a fresh rent deed for the renewal of their license to carry on the business of a 'commission agent'. "In a relationship of tenant and landlord, the rent deed is not required to be executed every year or at short intervals," observed Justice GURVINDER SINGH GILL, highlighting the essence of statutory tenancy.

In a conciliatory outcome, the court disposed of the petition and granted the petitioner the liberty to apply afresh for the license. The respondents were directed not to insist on a fresh lease deed, particularly since the petitioner is still in possession of the premises. The court also mentioned, "Needless to mention, the petitioner shall furnish affidavit deposing categorically with respect to the factum of his possession and the status and character of his possession over the premises in question."

Date of Decision: 03.10.2023

M/s Siya Ram Apple Merchants vs State Agricultural Marketing Board and another 

Latest Legal News