Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Unequivocal Admission of Wage Arrears Claims Recognized, Tribunal’s Award Upheld: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Rekha Palli, has upheld the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal concerning the wage arrears claims between Air India Limited and its employee unions. The court dismissed the petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the arbitral awards that favored the respondents.

Justice Palli, in her landmark judgment, recognized the “unequivocal admission” of the dues by the petitioner. In her words, “the Management’s stance in the documents was unambiguous and amounted to an unequivocal admission of the claim for wage arrears,” thereby dismissing the petitioner’s contention that these were mere recommendations to the Union of India.

The court meticulously navigated through the challenges posed by the Presidential Directives and Settlement Memoranda, affirming the Tribunal’s authority to adjudicate the quantum of arrears payable from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2007. The petitions, which argued that the Tribunal had exceeded its mandate and the legality of the Presidential Directive, were thus rejected.

The judgment further delved Into the legitimacy of the Presidential Directive issued under Section 9 of the Air Corporations (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal) Act, 1994, and highlighted the administrative nature of such directives. It was stated that these are instructions from the Administrative Ministry and are subject to legal scrutiny.

Moreover, the court upheld the Tribunal’s direction for the payment of compound interest on the entire adjudged amount, including interest, aligning with the principles set forth in the Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd. V. State of Orissa and UHL Power Company Ltd. V. State of Himachal Pradesh cases.

The decision has been welcomed by the employee unions, who have been in a long-standing dispute with the airline over their rightful claims. The representatives of the respondents, Mr. Jay Savla and his team, have expressed satisfaction with the court’s reasoning and the outcome of the judgment.

Date of Decision: 08.11.2023

 AIR INDIA LIMITED VS ALL INDIA AIRCRAFT ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-08-Nov-2023-Air-India-Ltd-Vs-All-India-Aircraft-Engg-Assoc.pdf"]

Latest Legal News