No Work No Pay: Delhi High Court Denies Back Wages To Reinstated Army Officer State Cannot Use 'Delay & Laches' To Evade Compensation For Land Taken Without Authority Of Law: Calcutta High Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Jail Appeal Solely On 3157-Day Delay; Orders Release Of Life Convict After 22 Years In Jail 138 NI Act | Failure To Produce Income Tax Returns Not Fatal To Cheque Bounce Case If Debt Is Established: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Public Records Not In Party's 'Power Or Possession' Until Actually Obtained; Leave Not Required For Rebuttal Documents: AP High Court For Conviction Under Section 34 IPC, Prosecution Must Establish Prior Meeting Of Minds & Pre-Arranged Plan: Allahabad High Court Merciless Beating With Blunt Side Of Deadly Weapons To Spread Terror Constitutes Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court CIT Can’t Invoke Revisionary Jurisdiction Merely Because AO’s Enquiry Was ‘Inadequate’ If View Is Plausible: Bombay High Court Mere Presence At Crime Scene Without Proof Of Prior Concert Insufficient To Invoke Section 34 IPC For Murder: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Be Used As Tools For Coercion: Bombay HC Dismisses Application To Implead Developer Without Contractual Nexus, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost Specific Performance Cannot Be Granted For Contingent Contracts Dependent On Third-Party Conveyance: Madras High Court Unlawful Subletting Is A ‘Continuing Wrong’, Fresh Limitation Period Runs As Long As Breach Continues: Bombay High Court Courts Must Specify Payment Timeline In Specific Performance Decrees; Order XX Rule 12A CPC Is Mandatory: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Does Not Automatically Rescind Due To Delay; Courts Can Extend Time For Deposit: Supreme Court Madras High Court Quashes Forgery Case Against Mahindra World City After Victims Accept Alternate Land In Settlement Motor Accident Claims: 13-Day FIR Delay Not Fatal; 80% Physical Disability Can Be Treated As 100% Functional Disability: Punjab & Haryana HC Murderer Cannot Inherit Property From Victim Through Wills; Section 25 Hindu Succession Act Bar Applies To Testamentary Succession: Supreme Court Courts Must Pierce Veil Of Clever Drafting To Reject Suits Barred By Benami Law; 2016 Amendments Are Retrospective: Supreme Court Indian Railways Is A Consumer, Not A Deemed Distribution Licensee; Must Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge For Open Access: Supreme Court Technical Rules Of Evidence Act Do Not Apply To Departmental Enquiries: Supreme Court Public Employment Cannot Be Converted Into An Instrument Of Fraud; Police Personnel Using Dual Identity Strikes At Root Of Service: Supreme Court

Uncontested Evidence Leads to Divorce: Orissa High Court, Dissolving Marriage and Awarding Alimony

15 September 2024 8:55 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


Orissa High Court delivered a significant judgment in the case of Laxmi Narayan Singh v. Sunitaprava Jenamani @ Singh (MATA No. 119 of 2022). The Division Bench, comprising Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo, reversed the Family Court's earlier decision and granted a decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The court also directed the appellant-husband to pay ₹5 lakh as permanent alimony to the respondent-wife.

Laxmi Narayan Singh, the appellant, had filed a petition for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. He stated that the couple had an initially happy married life, and the respondent-wife conceived and gave birth to their son on March 8, 2016. He claimed that after the birth, the respondent insisted on living with her parents, refusing his proposal to stay in a rented house away from his family. He alleged that the respondent deserted him on February 25, 2017, without his consent. The respondent-wife, in her objection, accused the appellant and his family of demanding money and physically assaulting her. She admitted to leaving the matrimonial home on February 25, 2017, with the minor child and filed a police complaint shortly afterward.

The Family Court had previously dismissed the divorce petition filed by the appellant on May 11, 2022, and also dismissed the respondent's petition for restitution of conjugal rights on February 19, 2022.

The main legal issues were whether the respondent-wife's actions amounted to cruelty and desertion under matrimonial laws and whether the appellant-husband was entitled to a decree of divorce on these grounds.

Cruelty and Desertion: The court noted that the appellant-husband claimed the marriage was initially happy but deteriorated after the birth of their child when the respondent demanded to live with her parents. The court observed that the respondent admitted leaving the matrimonial home and lodging police complaints against the appellant, resulting in several police cases. During the trial, the respondent and her father simply denied the suggestion that she left the matrimonial home without providing a detailed explanation. The court found this omission significant, indicating that the respondent had indeed left the matrimonial home without just cause.

Appellant's Financial Status: The appellant provided evidence of his financial status, including a certificate from Delhi Public School Synergy Dhenkanal, stating his net monthly salary as ₹7642. The court noted the appellant's modest income and considered this while determining the quantum of permanent alimony. The respondent was approximately 34 years old and a graduate, suggesting her potential for financial independence.

The Orissa High Court reversed the Family Court's judgment, accepting the appellant's grounds for divorce. The bench ruled that the evidence presented by the appellant regarding cruelty and desertion was unchallenged and unrefuted by the respondent. The court dissolved the marriage solemnized on March 9, 2015, by a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

The court also ordered the appellant to pay permanent alimony of ₹5 lakh to the respondent. Justice Arindam Sinha, while delivering the judgment, stated, "In taking approximately a percentage thereof on an annual basis, we direct permanent alimony at ₹500000/-." The alimony is to be deposited in the Family Court within two months​.

The Orissa High Court's decision highlights the importance of unchallenged evidence in matrimonial disputes. By granting divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, the court emphasized that failure to refute allegations effectively can lead to a decree of divorce. The court's order for permanent alimony reflects a balanced approach, considering the appellant's financial status and the respondent's potential for independence.

Date of Decision: September 12, 2024

Laxmi Narayan Singh v. Sunitaprava Jenamani @ Singh

Latest Legal News