Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Unauthorized Construction Must Align with Corporation’s Sanctioned Plan: Cal. High Court Stresses on Compliance with Sanctioned Plans in Construction Disputes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on property and construction laws, the High Court at Calcutta in its civil appellate jurisdiction, presided over by Justices M. V. Muralidaran and Arijit Banerjee, emphasized the importance of adhering to sanctioned plans in property development. The case, titled Smt. Chandana Saha & Anr. Vs. Sri Ashok Kumar Roy & Ors. (Case No: FMAT 528 of 2023 + IA No: CAN/1/2023), revolved around a dispute concerning unauthorized construction in the “Hiralal Commercial Complex” at Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, Kolkata.

The appellants, Smt. Chandana Saha and another, challenged the order dated October 12, 2023, which allowed an injunction application by the respondents in Title Suit No.697 of 2023. The primary issue was the alleged unauthorized modifications by the plaintiffs to their property unit, which was objected to by the defendants on the grounds of non-compliance with the Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s sanctioned plan.

In its observation, the Court remarked on the criticality of adhering to authorized plans, stating, “Unauthorized construction must align with the Corporation’s sanctioned plan.” This directive underlines the Court’s focus on maintaining legal and regulatory compliance in property alterations and constructions.

The Court expressed surprise and concern over the inaction of the concerned Executive Engineer, following a prior direction for a spot inspection to verify the claims of unauthorized construction. It was expected that a final reasoned order from the Executive Engineer would be filed by December 16, 2023, for review in the next hearing scheduled for December 18, 2023.

The judgment further clarifies that any further construction or alteration by the respondents must comply with the outcome of the appeal. In essence, if the alterations are found deviating from the sanctioned plan at the appeal’s disposal, they would need to be undone.

Date of Decision: December 1, 2023

Smt. Chandana Saha & Anr.  Vs. Sri Ashok Kumar Roy & Ors.

Latest Legal News