Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal

Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report

24 September 2024 12:29 PM

By: sayum


Intermediate Quantity of Methamphetamine and Clean Criminal Record Justify Bail. In a significant ruling on September 23, 2024, the Kerala High Court granted regular bail to Muhammed Nisar, the sole accused in Bail Application No. 6058 of 2024. Nisar, arrested for possession of an intermediate quantity of Methamphetamine under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), was previously released on interim bail due to delays in the submission of the chemical analysis report. The Court, noting the petitioner's clean criminal record and near completion of the investigation, made the interim bail order permanent.

On May 3, 2024, police officers from the Koppam Police Station, Palakkad, intercepted the vehicle of the petitioner, Muhammed Nisar, during a routine search. The officers discovered 13.87 grams of a substance initially believed to be MDMA. Nisar was arrested on June 29, 2024, and charged under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act for possessing a controlled substance in intermediate quantity.

Subsequent forensic tests confirmed the substance was Methamphetamine rather than MDMA. This alteration did not change the fact that the quantity of the contraband was intermediate, keeping the charges under Section 22(c) intact. The delay in submitting the chemical analysis report led to Nisar being granted interim bail on August 13, 2024.

The Court was tasked with determining whether regular bail should be granted, considering the change in the identification of the contraband, the delay in the chemical report submission, and the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal history.

Possession of Intermediate Quantity: Despite the misidentification of the contraband as MDMA, the amount of Methamphetamine found was classified as "intermediate," which allows for bail under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act.

“The contraband involved is of intermediate quantity, which made the petitioner eligible for consideration of bail,” noted the Court [Para 5].

Delay in Chemical Analysis: The Investigating Officer’s failure to submit the chemical analysis report within the time directed by the Court led to the initial grant of interim bail.

“Given the Investigating Officer’s delay in submitting the chemical analysis report, the Court had earlier enlarged the petitioner on interim bail on 13.08.2024” [Para 4].

No Prior Criminal Record: The Court highlighted that Nisar’s clean criminal history worked in his favor when considering the bail application.

“The petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents, which favors the granting of regular bail” [Para 5].

Justice C.S. Dias considered all relevant facts, including the petitioner’s compliance with the conditions of interim bail, the absence of a prior criminal record, and the completion of recovery and investigation. Based on these factors, the Court granted regular bail by making the interim order permanent.

Completion of Investigation: The Court acknowledged that the investigation was almost complete and the contraband had been seized.

Interim Bail Compliance: The petitioner had complied with all interim bail conditions and posed no threat to public order, further supporting the Court’s decision.

“Considering that the contraband is of intermediate quantity and the investigation is practically complete, the interim bail order is made absolute,” the Court concluded [Para 6].

In light of the circumstances, the Kerala High Court granted regular bail to Muhammed Nisar. The delay in the chemical analysis report and the petitioner’s clean record were pivotal in the decision, allowing Nisar to remain free on bail under the previously set conditions.

Date of Decision: 23 September 2024

Muhammed Nisar vs. State of Kerala

Latest Legal News