Plaintiff Entitled to Lead Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Denial of Co-Sharer’s Rights Does Not Amount to Ouster from Joint Family Property: Karnataka High Court Even One Link in Chain Of Circumstances Is Broken, Accused Must Get Benefit: Kerala High Court Acquits Man Convicted For Rape And Delay in FIR and Manipulated Evidence: High Court Upholds Acquittal in Assault Case” Maternity Leave Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to Third Pregnancy if Leave Was Not Availed Before: Madras High Court Habeas Corpus Cannot Continue Once Detenue Returns: Supreme Court Dismisses Frivolous Petition False and Vexatious Cases Cannot Be Allowed to Harass Innocent Families – Supreme Court Quashes 498A Proceedings Initiated After Divorce Case Income Tax Returns Are Conclusive Proof of Earnings in Motor Accident Cases:  Supreme Court Enhances Compensation by Over ₹10 Lakh Spouse in a Void Marriage Entitled to Permanent Alimony Under Hindu Marriage Act": Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting Views Appointment to Public Office Must Follow the Law, Not Executive Discretion: Supreme Court Quashes Chairperson’s Selection in Homeopathy Commission Quashing | Mere Mention of Section 307 IPC Does Not Bar Quashing – Courts Must Examine Injury, Intent, and Evidence: Supreme Court Procedural Compliance Must Not Trump Substantive Justice  – Supreme Court Quashes Abatement of Second Appeals Eyewitnesses Who Remain Silent for Nine Days Cannot Be Considered Reliable" – Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted in Double Murder Case Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act Cannot Be Misused to Convert Civil Disputes into Criminal Cases: Supreme Court Quashes FIR

Transparency and Efficiency Are Paramount: Supreme Court Constitutes High-Powered Sale Committee to Ensure Investor Refunds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Justices invoke Article 142, direct SEBI to liquidate Sai Group assets and prioritize compensation for defrauded investors.

The Supreme Court has directed the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to liquidate the assets of the Sai Group of Companies, ensuring the proceeds are distributed to genuine investors. The decision, rendered by Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, emphasizes the need for a transparent and efficient refund process and underscores the court’s commitment to achieving complete justice for affected investors.

Petitioners Balasaheb Keshawrao Bhapkar, his wife, and son, the founder-directors of the Sai Group of Companies, sought directions for SEBI to liquidate their attached assets and refund the proceeds to investors. The Sai Group, comprising entities like Sai Prasad Properties Ltd., Sai Prasad Foods Ltd., and others, faced allegations of illegal fund mobilization. Various regulatory actions were taken, including SEBI’s orders restraining the companies from collecting money and attaching their properties. Multiple FIRs were filed across several states under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, IPC, and other relevant statutes.

The Supreme Court recognized SEBI’s efforts but acknowledged the complexity and challenges in conducting timely public auctions. The court noted the necessity of a dedicated committee to streamline the process. “Despite SEBI’s bona fide pursuits, the liquidation of assets through time-bound public auctions presents numerous challenges,” the court observed.

To address these challenges, the court constituted a High-Powered Sale Committee (HPSC) led by former Supreme Court judge Justice S. Ravindra Bhatt. The HPSC is tasked with auctioning the assets, creating a property database, and ensuring that investor claims are satisfied transparently and efficiently. The court granted the HPSC civil court powers to expedite the process.

The court detailed the HPSC’s responsibilities in identifying investors, determining refund amounts, and managing an escrow account for the sale proceeds. The refund process will be widely publicized to ensure transparency. “The HPSC shall ensure a transparent and efficient refund process,” the court emphasized, highlighting the importance of investor confidence in the system.

Invoking Article 142 of the Constitution, the court underscored its commitment to complete justice, justifying the constitution of the HPSC given the exceptional circumstances. The court also highlighted the petitioners’ prolonged incarceration and the investors’ decade-long wait for refunds as critical factors in its decision.

Justice Surya Kant remarked, “The creation of the HPSC is a necessary step to ensure justice for the investors who have waited far too long for their rightful refunds.” The judgment also stated, “The HPSC shall operate with full transparency, ensuring the highest standards of integrity and efficiency in the liquidation process.”

The Supreme Court’s order to liquidate the Sai Group’s assets and refund investors marks a significant step towards resolving a long-standing financial debacle. By establishing the HPSC, the court aims to ensure a fair, transparent, and efficient process, reinforcing the judiciary’s commitment to upholding investor rights and maintaining market integrity. The landmark decision sets a precedent for handling similar cases in the future, highlighting the importance of regulatory vigilance and judicial intervention in protecting investors.

Date of Decision: 15th July 2024

Balasaheb Keshawrao Bhapkar & Ors. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

 

Similar News