Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Threats judge's wife by lawyer, formation of SIT to probe FIR: SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court ordered the Director General of Police in Uttar Pradesh to form a Special Investigation Team to investigate a FIR filed by the wife of an Additional District Judge alleging a threat by a Lawyer.

The bench of Justices Surya Kant and Abhay S. Oka ordered that the petitioner not be arrested for two weeks so that he may apply for pre-arrest bail before the proper forum.

In this instance, the wife of a Judicial Officer filed a First Information Report (FIR) against the petitioner (Amit Kumar Jain), alleging that he was threatening her. She sought appropriate protection for her family, citing multiple instances of threats.

The petitioner was consequently charged under Sections 452, 387, 353, 506, and 507 of the Indian Penal Code. Before the Allahabad High Court, he contested the FIR on the grounds that the Judicial Officer and his wife were complicit in the crime.

The Allahabad High Court denied Amit Kumar Jain's petition to transfer the case to another investigating agency, stating that the allegations were neither specific nor substantiated, and that there was no reason to question the impartiality of the Investigating Officer.

The Supreme Court ordered SSP to oversee the investigation into this matter.

The Petitioner had filed a Special Leave Petition with the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court's ruling.

Counsel for Ms. Preetika Dwivedi requested two weeks to file a counter-affidavit and an Action Taken Report.

To ensure that F.I.R. is investigated in a fair, impartial, and dispassionate manner, the Supreme Court ordered the Director General of Police of Uttar Pradesh to form a Special Investigation Team (SIT) led by a directly recruited IPS Officer and consisting of two additional Members with the ranks of Dy. SP and Inspector.

In light of the preceding, the Supreme Court scheduled the case for 22 August 2022.

D.D:01-08-2022

Amit Kumar Jain  Versus State Of U.P. & Ors.

Latest Legal News