Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Threats judge's wife by lawyer, formation of SIT to probe FIR: SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court ordered the Director General of Police in Uttar Pradesh to form a Special Investigation Team to investigate a FIR filed by the wife of an Additional District Judge alleging a threat by a Lawyer.

The bench of Justices Surya Kant and Abhay S. Oka ordered that the petitioner not be arrested for two weeks so that he may apply for pre-arrest bail before the proper forum.

In this instance, the wife of a Judicial Officer filed a First Information Report (FIR) against the petitioner (Amit Kumar Jain), alleging that he was threatening her. She sought appropriate protection for her family, citing multiple instances of threats.

The petitioner was consequently charged under Sections 452, 387, 353, 506, and 507 of the Indian Penal Code. Before the Allahabad High Court, he contested the FIR on the grounds that the Judicial Officer and his wife were complicit in the crime.

The Allahabad High Court denied Amit Kumar Jain's petition to transfer the case to another investigating agency, stating that the allegations were neither specific nor substantiated, and that there was no reason to question the impartiality of the Investigating Officer.

The Supreme Court ordered SSP to oversee the investigation into this matter.

The Petitioner had filed a Special Leave Petition with the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court's ruling.

Counsel for Ms. Preetika Dwivedi requested two weeks to file a counter-affidavit and an Action Taken Report.

To ensure that F.I.R. is investigated in a fair, impartial, and dispassionate manner, the Supreme Court ordered the Director General of Police of Uttar Pradesh to form a Special Investigation Team (SIT) led by a directly recruited IPS Officer and consisting of two additional Members with the ranks of Dy. SP and Inspector.

In light of the preceding, the Supreme Court scheduled the case for 22 August 2022.

D.D:01-08-2022

Amit Kumar Jain  Versus State Of U.P. & Ors.

Latest Legal News