GRANTS BAIL IN NDPS CASE, HOLDS DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS ALONE INSUFFICIENT FOR CONVICTION Foreign Conviction Does Not Shield Accused from Indian Prosecution: Uttarakhand High Court Denies Bail in Bitcoin Money Laundering Case Forfeiture of Earnest Money Must Be Reasonable, No Interest Payable If Buyer Cancels Due to Falling Property Prices: Supreme Court IBPS | Exam Bodies Must Provide Scribes and Extra Time to All Disabled Candidates, Not Just Those With Benchmark Disabilities: Supreme Court Minor Discrepancies in Witness Statements Do Not Discredit Their Reliability," Rules Punjab and Haryana High Court in Murder Case Suspicion, No Matter How Strong, Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Karnataka High Court Acquits Two in Murder Case Prolonged Incarceration Violates Article 21 – Bail Granted Despite NDPS Act Restrictions: Kerala High Court Kolkata Book Fair Not a Public Function: Calcutta High Court Dismisses VHP's Writ Petition A Gift With Conditions is Not a Gift in Perpetuity – Violation of Purpose Mandates Reversion: Andhra Pradesh High Court Employee Cannot Demand Advocate in Domestic Enquiry Unless Employer’s Representative is a Legally Trained Mind: Bombay High Court Milkman as Scribe Raises Eyebrows: High Court Dismisses Property Claim Over Suspicious Will Contractor Bound by Contractual Terms, No Right to Claim Damages After Accepting Extensions: Supreme Court On Failure of the Highest Bidder, Property Must Be Re-Auctioned, Private Negotiation Impermissible: Karnataka High Court Preventive Detention Without Procedural Compliance is Unconstitutional: Kerala High Court Quashes Detention Order Under KAAPA Courts Are for Litigants, Not the Other Way Around: Madras High Court Overhauls Family Court Procedures Landlord is the Best Judge of His Requirement; Tenant Cannot Dictate Alternative Properties: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Eviction Khatedari Rights Cannot Be Claimed Over SC Land Through Adverse Possession: Rajasthan High Court A Law Cannot Be Struck Down on Overruled Precedents: Calcutta High Court Upholds West Bengal Entry Tax Act Producer of Film Is First Owner of Soundtrack Unless Contract States Otherwise: Delhi High Court Affirms Saregama’s Rights Mere Refusal to Repay a Loan Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Under Section 306 IPC: Allahabad High Court Mere Re-Appreciation of Evidence Is Not Permissible in a Second Appeal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Merely Alleging Money Laundering Without Evidence is an Abuse of Legal Process: Bombay High Court Imposed 1 Lakh Cost on ED Right to Private Defence is Not Absolute and Cannot Extend to Inflicting Fatal Injuries: Punjab and Haryana High Court Failure to Pay Business Dues Does Not Constitute a Criminal Offense: Calcutta High Court Quashes Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Proceedings Income Tax | Reassessment Notices Must Pass Surviving Time Test—Delhi High Court Directs AOs to Comply with Supreme Court's Rajeev Bansal Ruling Perjury Allegations Against Wife and Counsel Dismissed; Court Imposes Costs for Frivolous Litigation: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Permits Protest on Temple Land Encroachment Issue, Imposes Restrictions for Public Order A Senior Citizen’s Right to Peace Cannot Be Held Hostage by a Permissive Occupant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders Eviction of Son-in-Law from Father-in-Law’s House Widows Applying on Merit Cannot Be Denied Relaxation Under Two-Child Norm: Rajasthan High Court

The Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Justice C.S. Dias emphasizes the principle of "bail as a rule, jail as an exception," while granting bail to Khalil Rahman in Crime No. 201/2024.

The High Court of Kerala, presided over by Justice C.S. Dias, granted bail to Khalil Rahman, accused in a high-profile attempted murder case. The judgment, delivered on July 17, 2024, underscores the principle that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, as long as there is no substantial reason to deny it. The court considered the completion of the investigation and the absence of the accused's prior criminal record in its decision.

The case revolves around an incident on April 16, 2024, where Khalil Rahman allegedly used obscene language and inflicted a severe head injury on the defacto complainant's husband with an axe, resulting in a skull fracture. Rahman was arrested on June 4, 2024, and had been in judicial custody since then. The prosecution charged him under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including Sections 294(b), 506, 324, 326, and 307.

The court noted that the investigation had been completed, and the final report was submitted on July 10, 2024. This significantly influenced the decision to grant bail, as there was no further need for the accused's detention for investigative purposes.

Justice Dias referenced the Supreme Court's judgment in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI, which emphasizes the presumption of innocence until proven guilty and views pre-conviction detention as punitive. "Any imprisonment prior to conviction is to be considered as punitive and it would be improper on the part of the Court to refuse bail solely on the ground of former conduct," the judgment noted.

Citing Dataram Singh v. State of U.P., Justice Dias reiterated that bail is a rule and jail is an exception, stressing that the discretion to grant bail should be exercised judiciously. "The right to bail cannot be denied merely due to the sentiments of the society," he remarked.

"The fundamental postulate of criminal jurisprudence is the presumption of innocence until a person is found guilty," Justice Dias observed. He further stated, "The right to bail cannot be denied merely due to the sentiments of the society."

The High Court of Kerala's decision to grant bail to Khalil Rahman reinforces the judiciary's commitment to the principle of presumed innocence and the rule of law. By emphasizing the importance of judicial discretion and the need for a compassionate approach, the judgment sets a significant precedent in the context of bail applications in serious criminal cases. The ruling underscores that completed investigations and lack of prior criminal records are critical factors in deciding bail, ensuring that pre-trial detention is not used punitively.

Date of Decision: July 17, 2024

Khalil Rahman v. State of Kerala

 

Similar News