Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

The Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Justice C.S. Dias emphasizes the principle of "bail as a rule, jail as an exception," while granting bail to Khalil Rahman in Crime No. 201/2024.

The High Court of Kerala, presided over by Justice C.S. Dias, granted bail to Khalil Rahman, accused in a high-profile attempted murder case. The judgment, delivered on July 17, 2024, underscores the principle that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, as long as there is no substantial reason to deny it. The court considered the completion of the investigation and the absence of the accused's prior criminal record in its decision.

The case revolves around an incident on April 16, 2024, where Khalil Rahman allegedly used obscene language and inflicted a severe head injury on the defacto complainant's husband with an axe, resulting in a skull fracture. Rahman was arrested on June 4, 2024, and had been in judicial custody since then. The prosecution charged him under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including Sections 294(b), 506, 324, 326, and 307.

The court noted that the investigation had been completed, and the final report was submitted on July 10, 2024. This significantly influenced the decision to grant bail, as there was no further need for the accused's detention for investigative purposes.

Justice Dias referenced the Supreme Court's judgment in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI, which emphasizes the presumption of innocence until proven guilty and views pre-conviction detention as punitive. "Any imprisonment prior to conviction is to be considered as punitive and it would be improper on the part of the Court to refuse bail solely on the ground of former conduct," the judgment noted.

Citing Dataram Singh v. State of U.P., Justice Dias reiterated that bail is a rule and jail is an exception, stressing that the discretion to grant bail should be exercised judiciously. "The right to bail cannot be denied merely due to the sentiments of the society," he remarked.

"The fundamental postulate of criminal jurisprudence is the presumption of innocence until a person is found guilty," Justice Dias observed. He further stated, "The right to bail cannot be denied merely due to the sentiments of the society."

The High Court of Kerala's decision to grant bail to Khalil Rahman reinforces the judiciary's commitment to the principle of presumed innocence and the rule of law. By emphasizing the importance of judicial discretion and the need for a compassionate approach, the judgment sets a significant precedent in the context of bail applications in serious criminal cases. The ruling underscores that completed investigations and lack of prior criminal records are critical factors in deciding bail, ensuring that pre-trial detention is not used punitively.

Date of Decision: July 17, 2024

Khalil Rahman v. State of Kerala

 

Latest Legal News