Conversion for Reservation Benefits Is a Fraud on the Constitution: Supreme Court Rejects SC Certificate for Reconverted Christian Patent Office Guidelines Must Be Followed for Consistency in Decisions: Madras High Court Limitation Cannot Obstruct Justice When Parties Consent to Extensions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Additional Fees Are Incentives, Not Penalties: Orissa High Court Upholds Central Motor Vehicles Rules Amendment Interpretation of Tender Eligibility Criteria Lies with Tendering Authority: Gujrat High Court Upholds Discharge of Tender Complaints Were Contradictory and Did Not Establish Prima Facie Case for SC/ST Act Charges: J&K HC Insurance Cover Notes Hold Policy Validity Unless Proven Otherwise: Kerala High Court Upholds Compensation in Fatal Accident Case Article 21 Of Constitution Applies Irrespective Of Nature Of Crime. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Amounts To Punishment Without Adjudication: Calcutta HC Concept Of 'Liberal Approach' Cannot Be Used To Jettison The Substantive Law Of Limitation: Delhi High Court Limitation is Not Always a Mixed Question of Fact and Law: Bombay High Court Dismisses 31-Year-Old Specific Performance Suit as Time-Barred Intent Coupled with Trespass Constitutes Full Offence: Supreme Court Mere Possession of Bribe Money Insufficient Without Proof of Demand and Acceptance: Supreme Court Right to Promotion is Not a Fundamental Right; Retrospective Benefits Without Service Cannot Be Granted: Supreme Court of India Oral Gift Validity in Mohammedan Law: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Constructive Possession and Injunction Unauthorized Construction on Government Irrigation Land Must Be Demolished: Calcutta High Court Directs Sub-Divisional Officer High Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Over Road Obstruction Due to Non-Prosecution Victim of Rape Has Right to Bodily Integrity and Reproductive Choice: Gujarat High Court Permits Termination of 24-Week Pregnancy

Termination of Mid-Day Meal Agency Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Andhra Pradesh High Court

17 October 2024 9:18 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Andhra Pradesh High Court, in Sali Chanti vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors., quashed the termination of the petitioner’s mid-day meal contract at Zilla Parishad High School (Z.P.H.S.), Telaprolu, for violating principles of natural justice. The Court ruled that the termination, issued without giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, was arbitrary and unlawful.

The petitioner, Sali Chanti, had been appointed in 2005 as the mid-day meal implementing agency at Z.P.H.S. Telaprolu, Krishna District, and had been performing her duties without any complaints. On September 9, 2024, her contract was terminated by the 6th respondent without any prior notice or explanation, prompting her to file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking reinstatement.

Whether the termination of the petitioner’s mid-day meal contract without giving her an opportunity to be heard violated the principles of natural justice.

Whether the respondents could terminate the contract without following due process as laid out in earlier government orders.

Violation of Natural Justice: The Court emphasized that the principles of natural justice require any administrative action affecting a person’s rights to be preceded by notice and an opportunity to be heard. The termination of the petitioner’s contract without a show cause notice was arbitrary and violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, which ensure the right to equality and protection of life and personal liberty.

Due Process and Show Cause Notice: The Court observed that the termination order was contrary to government procedures, which require issuing a show cause notice and considering the petitioner’s response before passing any adverse order.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed the termination order, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue implementing the mid-day meal program at the school. If the respondents still intended to terminate her services, they were instructed to issue a show cause notice, provide an opportunity for the petitioner to explain her case, and pass appropriate orders after a fair hearing.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court’s ruling underscored the importance of following due process and ensuring fairness in administrative actions. The Court reinstated the petitioner as the mid-day meal implementing agency and quashed the termination order for violating the principles of natural justice.

 

Date of Decision: October 16, 2024

Sali Chanti vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Similar News