Without Partition By Metes And Bounds, Co-Sharer Cannot Seek Recovery Of Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Order VII Rule 7 CPC Supreme Court Holds Plaintiff Entitled To Declaration Of Title Over Undivided Half Share Despite Claiming Entire Property Under Gift Deed Supreme Court Reaffirms Legality Of Remainder Of Natural Life Sentences Without Remission, Dismisses Batch Of Writ Petitions 'State Cannot Take Advantage Of Its Own Wrong': Supreme Court Holds Promotees Entitled To Count Ad Hoc Service For Seniority If Within Quota 'Elevators Are Common Carriers, Entail Heightened Duty of Care': Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order Holding OTIS Principally Liable For Death Due To Malfunctioning Lift Supreme Court Dismisses Compensation Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, Holds Reach Stacker Operating in Custom-Bonded ICD Area Is Not a "Motor Vehicle" Missing ACRs Due To Illegal Termination Cannot Block Higher Judicial Pay Scales: Supreme Court Grants Relief To Rajasthan Judicial Officer Subsequent Suit Generally Transferable To Court Where Earlier Suit On Same Subject Matter Is Pending: Allahabad High Court Successive Anticipatory Bail Maintainable Under BNSS If Fact Situation Changes Or Previous Findings Become Obsolete: Andhra Pradesh High Court Tenant's "Deemed Purchaser" Right Defeated By Retrospective Notification Under Section 88(1)(b) Of Tenancy Act: Bombay High Court Buyer Not Entitled To Refund Of Earnest Money Once Sale Deed Is Duly Executed Under The Agreement: Calcutta High Court Contradictory Pleas Vitiate Defence; Drawer Liable Even If Signed Blank Cheque Was Handed Over: Delhi High Court Working Mother's Relocation To Another City Not A Ground To Completely Deny Overnight Custody To Father: Karnataka High Court Civil Courts Barred From Granting Injunctions Against SARFAESI Actions Even If Partition Suit Is Maintainable: Kerala High Court S.147 NI Act Is A Special Law, Overrides S.320 CrPC; Offence Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Appeal: Madras High Court Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court

Termination of Mid-Day Meal Agency Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Andhra Pradesh High Court

17 October 2024 9:18 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Andhra Pradesh High Court, in Sali Chanti vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors., quashed the termination of the petitioner’s mid-day meal contract at Zilla Parishad High School (Z.P.H.S.), Telaprolu, for violating principles of natural justice. The Court ruled that the termination, issued without giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, was arbitrary and unlawful.

The petitioner, Sali Chanti, had been appointed in 2005 as the mid-day meal implementing agency at Z.P.H.S. Telaprolu, Krishna District, and had been performing her duties without any complaints. On September 9, 2024, her contract was terminated by the 6th respondent without any prior notice or explanation, prompting her to file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking reinstatement.

Whether the termination of the petitioner’s mid-day meal contract without giving her an opportunity to be heard violated the principles of natural justice.

Whether the respondents could terminate the contract without following due process as laid out in earlier government orders.

Violation of Natural Justice: The Court emphasized that the principles of natural justice require any administrative action affecting a person’s rights to be preceded by notice and an opportunity to be heard. The termination of the petitioner’s contract without a show cause notice was arbitrary and violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, which ensure the right to equality and protection of life and personal liberty.

Due Process and Show Cause Notice: The Court observed that the termination order was contrary to government procedures, which require issuing a show cause notice and considering the petitioner’s response before passing any adverse order.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed the termination order, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue implementing the mid-day meal program at the school. If the respondents still intended to terminate her services, they were instructed to issue a show cause notice, provide an opportunity for the petitioner to explain her case, and pass appropriate orders after a fair hearing.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court’s ruling underscored the importance of following due process and ensuring fairness in administrative actions. The Court reinstated the petitioner as the mid-day meal implementing agency and quashed the termination order for violating the principles of natural justice.

 

Date of Decision: October 16, 2024

Sali Chanti vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Latest Legal News