Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Telangana High Court Declares Government Order on Detention of Pakistani National Illegal, Orders Immediate Release

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Telangana has declared the Government Order (G.O.Rt.No.599, dated 02.11.2021) granting permission to detain a Pakistani national illegal and has ordered his immediate release. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Sri Justice K. Lakshman and Hon'ble Smt. Justice P. Sree Sudha on 13th July 2023.

The case revolved around Shaik Gulzar Khan, a Pakistani national residing in India, who was alleged to have entered the country using fraudulent documents and subsequently obtained an Indian passport using fake identification. A case was registered against him for offenses under the Indian Penal Code and other relevant Acts.

In the writ petition challenging the Government Order, Mr. M.A. Shakeel, learned counsel for the petitioner, argued that the 1st respondent did not have the authority to detain the detenu under Section 3(2)(e) of the Foreigners Act. The court, after considering the submissions made by all parties, found that the relevant power under Section 3(2)(g) of the Act had not been delegated to the 1st respondent by the appropriate authority.

Quoting the judgment, the court held that "G.O.Rt.No.599, dated 02.11.2021 issued by 1st respondent is illegal and the same is liable to be set aside." It further directed the immediate release of Shaik Gulzar Khan, subject to the conditions imposed by the lower court when granting bail.

However, the court clarified that its order would not preclude the authorities from completing the process of deportation in accordance with the law. Sri V.T. Kalyan, representing the Deputy Solicitor General of India, emphasized that "there are serious allegations against the detenu" and that the deportation process was still underway.

The judgment also referred to a previous Division Bench order dated 15.09.2022 in W.P.No.6407 of 2022 and batch, wherein a similar issue regarding delegation of power under Section 3(2)(g) of the Foreigners Act was addressed, leading to the same conclusion.

With the court's decision, Shaik Gulzar Khan will be released from custody, while the deportation process will continue as per the established legal procedures. The judgment has implications for cases involving the detention of foreigners and the delegation of powers under the Foreigners Act in the State of Telangana.

Date of Decision: 13th July, 2023

Shaik Daulath Bee vs State of Telangana

Latest Legal News