Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Habitual Defaulter: Discipline Remains Non-Negotiable

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, led by Justice Hima Kohli, upheld the dismissal of ex-soldier Madan Prasad, who was found guilty of habitual unauthorized absence from duty. The judgment came in response to Civil Appeal No. 246 of 2017, where Prasad had appealed against the decision of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Regional Bench, Lucknow.

The apex court's verdict, delivered on July 28, 2023, confirms the authority of the Summary Court Martial (SCM) to impose suitable punishment for offenses related to absence without leave. Justice Hima Kohli, in her judgment, emphasized that "discipline is the implicit hallmark of the Armed Forces and a non-negotiable condition of service."

The case revolved around Prasad's prolonged absence from duty, even after the extension of his granted leave was rejected. His defense claimed that he was caring for his ailing wife, but the court found no supporting evidence for his claim. Prasad's history of indiscipline further weakened his position, as he had previously faced several punishments for unauthorized leave.

Addressing the argument of the punishment being disproportionate, the court clarified that the SCM has the discretion to impose appropriate sentences, and dismissal from service was a legitimate punishment considering Prasad's repeated misconduct.

Bench stated, "The appellant remained out of line far too often for seeking condonation of his absence on leave, this time, for a prolonged period of 108 days which if accepted, would have sent a wrong signal to others in service."

The judgment reaffirms the importance of discipline in the Armed Forces and serves as a reminder to all personnel that any act of indiscipline will not be taken lightly. The dismissal from service serves as a cautionary tale for those who might attempt to breach the rules and regulations governing the Armed Forces.

Supreme Court's verdict in the case of Ex Sepoy Madan Prasad reinforces the principle of maintaining discipline in the Armed Forces and sends a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated. The judgment sets a precedent for future cases involving unauthorized absence and upholds the integrity and values of the Indian Armed Forces

Date of Decision: July 28, 2023

EX SEPOY MADAN PRASAD vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 

Latest Legal News