Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Habitual Defaulter: Discipline Remains Non-Negotiable

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, led by Justice Hima Kohli, upheld the dismissal of ex-soldier Madan Prasad, who was found guilty of habitual unauthorized absence from duty. The judgment came in response to Civil Appeal No. 246 of 2017, where Prasad had appealed against the decision of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Regional Bench, Lucknow.

The apex court's verdict, delivered on July 28, 2023, confirms the authority of the Summary Court Martial (SCM) to impose suitable punishment for offenses related to absence without leave. Justice Hima Kohli, in her judgment, emphasized that "discipline is the implicit hallmark of the Armed Forces and a non-negotiable condition of service."

The case revolved around Prasad's prolonged absence from duty, even after the extension of his granted leave was rejected. His defense claimed that he was caring for his ailing wife, but the court found no supporting evidence for his claim. Prasad's history of indiscipline further weakened his position, as he had previously faced several punishments for unauthorized leave.

Addressing the argument of the punishment being disproportionate, the court clarified that the SCM has the discretion to impose appropriate sentences, and dismissal from service was a legitimate punishment considering Prasad's repeated misconduct.

Bench stated, "The appellant remained out of line far too often for seeking condonation of his absence on leave, this time, for a prolonged period of 108 days which if accepted, would have sent a wrong signal to others in service."

The judgment reaffirms the importance of discipline in the Armed Forces and serves as a reminder to all personnel that any act of indiscipline will not be taken lightly. The dismissal from service serves as a cautionary tale for those who might attempt to breach the rules and regulations governing the Armed Forces.

Supreme Court's verdict in the case of Ex Sepoy Madan Prasad reinforces the principle of maintaining discipline in the Armed Forces and sends a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated. The judgment sets a precedent for future cases involving unauthorized absence and upholds the integrity and values of the Indian Armed Forces

Date of Decision: July 28, 2023

EX SEPOY MADAN PRASAD vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 

Latest Legal News