Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Upholds 5-Kilometre Mining Ban Around Chittorgarh Fort to Protect Heritage Monument

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a important decision, the Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed the importance of preserving national heritage monuments, especially in the face of industrial development challenges. The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti, ruled to continue the prohibition of mining activities using explosives within a five-kilometre radius of the historic Chittorgarh Fort.

The court, in its judgment, emphasized the significance of the Chittorgarh Fort, stating, "The Chittorgarh Fort represents the quintessence of a tribute to nationalism, courage, medieval chivalry, and sacrifice." This decision is seen as a balancing act between the need for mineral exploitation and the preservation of cultural heritage.

The case arose from a dispute involving Birla Corporation Limited and local activists, highlighting the conflict between limestone mining activities and the preservation of the fort, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The court noted the potential harm to the monument's structural integrity due to nearby mining activities, especially blasting operations.

In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court considered detailed reports from the CSIR-CBRI, Roorkee, and the Indian Bureau of Mines. These studies assessed the impact of mining activities on the fort, concluding that vibrations from blasting were within permissible limits. However, the court underscored the need for continuous monitoring and further studies using advanced technology.

The Supreme Court has directed the establishment of a multidisciplinary committee to conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment. The committee will focus on the impact of mining operations beyond the five-kilometre prohibited radius and will use advanced technological methods for this assessment.

This ruling has been welcomed by conservationists and historians, emphasizing the court's role in safeguarding India's rich cultural heritage. The mining industry, while acknowledging the need for environmental protection, is seeking clarity on the operational aspects of the judgment.

The Supreme Court's decision marks a significant step in the ongoing effort to balance industrial development with cultural and environmental preservation. The outcome of the further studies and assessments will be crucial in shaping the future of mining operations in proximity to heritage sites across India.

Date of Decision: 12th January 2024

BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VS BHANWAR SINGH AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News