Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Upholds 5-Kilometre Mining Ban Around Chittorgarh Fort to Protect Heritage Monument

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a important decision, the Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed the importance of preserving national heritage monuments, especially in the face of industrial development challenges. The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti, ruled to continue the prohibition of mining activities using explosives within a five-kilometre radius of the historic Chittorgarh Fort.

The court, in its judgment, emphasized the significance of the Chittorgarh Fort, stating, "The Chittorgarh Fort represents the quintessence of a tribute to nationalism, courage, medieval chivalry, and sacrifice." This decision is seen as a balancing act between the need for mineral exploitation and the preservation of cultural heritage.

The case arose from a dispute involving Birla Corporation Limited and local activists, highlighting the conflict between limestone mining activities and the preservation of the fort, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The court noted the potential harm to the monument's structural integrity due to nearby mining activities, especially blasting operations.

In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court considered detailed reports from the CSIR-CBRI, Roorkee, and the Indian Bureau of Mines. These studies assessed the impact of mining activities on the fort, concluding that vibrations from blasting were within permissible limits. However, the court underscored the need for continuous monitoring and further studies using advanced technology.

The Supreme Court has directed the establishment of a multidisciplinary committee to conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment. The committee will focus on the impact of mining operations beyond the five-kilometre prohibited radius and will use advanced technological methods for this assessment.

This ruling has been welcomed by conservationists and historians, emphasizing the court's role in safeguarding India's rich cultural heritage. The mining industry, while acknowledging the need for environmental protection, is seeking clarity on the operational aspects of the judgment.

The Supreme Court's decision marks a significant step in the ongoing effort to balance industrial development with cultural and environmental preservation. The outcome of the further studies and assessments will be crucial in shaping the future of mining operations in proximity to heritage sites across India.

Date of Decision: 12th January 2024

BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VS BHANWAR SINGH AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News