UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Upholds 5-Kilometre Mining Ban Around Chittorgarh Fort to Protect Heritage Monument

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a important decision, the Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed the importance of preserving national heritage monuments, especially in the face of industrial development challenges. The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti, ruled to continue the prohibition of mining activities using explosives within a five-kilometre radius of the historic Chittorgarh Fort.

The court, in its judgment, emphasized the significance of the Chittorgarh Fort, stating, "The Chittorgarh Fort represents the quintessence of a tribute to nationalism, courage, medieval chivalry, and sacrifice." This decision is seen as a balancing act between the need for mineral exploitation and the preservation of cultural heritage.

The case arose from a dispute involving Birla Corporation Limited and local activists, highlighting the conflict between limestone mining activities and the preservation of the fort, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The court noted the potential harm to the monument's structural integrity due to nearby mining activities, especially blasting operations.

In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court considered detailed reports from the CSIR-CBRI, Roorkee, and the Indian Bureau of Mines. These studies assessed the impact of mining activities on the fort, concluding that vibrations from blasting were within permissible limits. However, the court underscored the need for continuous monitoring and further studies using advanced technology.

The Supreme Court has directed the establishment of a multidisciplinary committee to conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment. The committee will focus on the impact of mining operations beyond the five-kilometre prohibited radius and will use advanced technological methods for this assessment.

This ruling has been welcomed by conservationists and historians, emphasizing the court's role in safeguarding India's rich cultural heritage. The mining industry, while acknowledging the need for environmental protection, is seeking clarity on the operational aspects of the judgment.

The Supreme Court's decision marks a significant step in the ongoing effort to balance industrial development with cultural and environmental preservation. The outcome of the further studies and assessments will be crucial in shaping the future of mining operations in proximity to heritage sites across India.

Date of Decision: 12th January 2024

BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VS BHANWAR SINGH AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News