Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter

SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN LAND SCAM CASE, WHILE SAFEGUARDING PERSONAL LIBERTY IS CRUCIAL, THE GRAVITY OF THE OFFENCE CANNOT BE IGNORED

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 7 July 2023, In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the anticipatory bail granted by the High Court in a land forgery case and directed a thorough investigation into the matter. The judgment, delivered by Honorable Justices Surya Kant and C.T. Ravikumar, highlights the seriousness of the alleged offences and the need for custodial interrogation in order to uncover the truth.

Supreme court emphasized the importance of striking a balance between individual rights and the interests of justice. It noted that while safeguarding personal liberty is crucial, the gravity of the offence cannot be ignored. The bench stated, "The alleged offences of forging documents for transferring ownership of land worth crores of rupees are grave in nature."

The case pertains to an elderly couple who claim to have been victims of a well-orchestrated fraud. They allege that forged documents, including a power of attorney and a sale deed, were used to transfer their valuable land to the accused. The court expressed concern over the suspicious nature of the transactions and the discrepancies in the execution and registration processes.

Highlighting the vulnerability of the victims, the court observed, "The Appellants are elderly couple. Being NRIs, the majority of their time is spent abroad... They have stated that they were not in India at the time of execution of the disputed sale deed." It further stated, "The Appellants have seemingly fallen prey to a well-orchestrated conspiracy hatched to rob them of their highly valuable property."

In light of these circumstances, the Supreme Court directed the Commissioner of Police, Gurugram, to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to take over the investigation. The SIT will be headed by an officer of the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and will have the power to subject the accused, buyers, and officials to custodial interrogation. The court stressed the need for a fair and unobstructed investigation to uncover the truth.

The judgment also emphasized the significance of cooperation from the authorities. The Court directed the authorities of the National Capital Territory of Delhi to extend full cooperation in verifying the authenticity of the alleged power of attorney. It further clarified that no interlocutory or interim orders passed by the Civil Court shall hamper the ongoing investigation.

The Supreme Court's decision in this case aims to address land scams and organized crimes related to land transactions, which have been a persistent issue in India. The judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting vulnerable individuals and communities, ensuring justice, and restoring public trust.

The Commissioner of Police, Gurugram, has been entrusted with monitoring the day-to-day progress of the investigation. The Court expects the investigation to be concluded within two months from the date of the order.

Date of Decision: July 7, 2023

Pratibha Manchanda & Anr.   vs State of Haryana & Anr. 

Latest Legal News