Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN LAND SCAM CASE, WHILE SAFEGUARDING PERSONAL LIBERTY IS CRUCIAL, THE GRAVITY OF THE OFFENCE CANNOT BE IGNORED

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 7 July 2023, In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the anticipatory bail granted by the High Court in a land forgery case and directed a thorough investigation into the matter. The judgment, delivered by Honorable Justices Surya Kant and C.T. Ravikumar, highlights the seriousness of the alleged offences and the need for custodial interrogation in order to uncover the truth.

Supreme court emphasized the importance of striking a balance between individual rights and the interests of justice. It noted that while safeguarding personal liberty is crucial, the gravity of the offence cannot be ignored. The bench stated, "The alleged offences of forging documents for transferring ownership of land worth crores of rupees are grave in nature."

The case pertains to an elderly couple who claim to have been victims of a well-orchestrated fraud. They allege that forged documents, including a power of attorney and a sale deed, were used to transfer their valuable land to the accused. The court expressed concern over the suspicious nature of the transactions and the discrepancies in the execution and registration processes.

Highlighting the vulnerability of the victims, the court observed, "The Appellants are elderly couple. Being NRIs, the majority of their time is spent abroad... They have stated that they were not in India at the time of execution of the disputed sale deed." It further stated, "The Appellants have seemingly fallen prey to a well-orchestrated conspiracy hatched to rob them of their highly valuable property."

In light of these circumstances, the Supreme Court directed the Commissioner of Police, Gurugram, to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to take over the investigation. The SIT will be headed by an officer of the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and will have the power to subject the accused, buyers, and officials to custodial interrogation. The court stressed the need for a fair and unobstructed investigation to uncover the truth.

The judgment also emphasized the significance of cooperation from the authorities. The Court directed the authorities of the National Capital Territory of Delhi to extend full cooperation in verifying the authenticity of the alleged power of attorney. It further clarified that no interlocutory or interim orders passed by the Civil Court shall hamper the ongoing investigation.

The Supreme Court's decision in this case aims to address land scams and organized crimes related to land transactions, which have been a persistent issue in India. The judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting vulnerable individuals and communities, ensuring justice, and restoring public trust.

The Commissioner of Police, Gurugram, has been entrusted with monitoring the day-to-day progress of the investigation. The Court expects the investigation to be concluded within two months from the date of the order.

Date of Decision: July 7, 2023

Pratibha Manchanda & Anr.   vs State of Haryana & Anr. 

Latest Legal News