Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN LAND SCAM CASE, WHILE SAFEGUARDING PERSONAL LIBERTY IS CRUCIAL, THE GRAVITY OF THE OFFENCE CANNOT BE IGNORED

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


On 7 July 2023, In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the anticipatory bail granted by the High Court in a land forgery case and directed a thorough investigation into the matter. The judgment, delivered by Honorable Justices Surya Kant and C.T. Ravikumar, highlights the seriousness of the alleged offences and the need for custodial interrogation in order to uncover the truth.

Supreme court emphasized the importance of striking a balance between individual rights and the interests of justice. It noted that while safeguarding personal liberty is crucial, the gravity of the offence cannot be ignored. The bench stated, "The alleged offences of forging documents for transferring ownership of land worth crores of rupees are grave in nature."

The case pertains to an elderly couple who claim to have been victims of a well-orchestrated fraud. They allege that forged documents, including a power of attorney and a sale deed, were used to transfer their valuable land to the accused. The court expressed concern over the suspicious nature of the transactions and the discrepancies in the execution and registration processes.

Highlighting the vulnerability of the victims, the court observed, "The Appellants are elderly couple. Being NRIs, the majority of their time is spent abroad... They have stated that they were not in India at the time of execution of the disputed sale deed." It further stated, "The Appellants have seemingly fallen prey to a well-orchestrated conspiracy hatched to rob them of their highly valuable property."

In light of these circumstances, the Supreme Court directed the Commissioner of Police, Gurugram, to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to take over the investigation. The SIT will be headed by an officer of the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and will have the power to subject the accused, buyers, and officials to custodial interrogation. The court stressed the need for a fair and unobstructed investigation to uncover the truth.

The judgment also emphasized the significance of cooperation from the authorities. The Court directed the authorities of the National Capital Territory of Delhi to extend full cooperation in verifying the authenticity of the alleged power of attorney. It further clarified that no interlocutory or interim orders passed by the Civil Court shall hamper the ongoing investigation.

The Supreme Court's decision in this case aims to address land scams and organized crimes related to land transactions, which have been a persistent issue in India. The judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting vulnerable individuals and communities, ensuring justice, and restoring public trust.

The Commissioner of Police, Gurugram, has been entrusted with monitoring the day-to-day progress of the investigation. The Court expects the investigation to be concluded within two months from the date of the order.

Date of Decision: July 7, 2023

Pratibha Manchanda & Anr.   vs State of Haryana & Anr. 

Latest Legal News