A Stranger to a Decree Cannot Claim Injury Unless He Shows Adverse Impact: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Challenge to Compromise over Debottar Property Land Acquisition | Compensation Based on Post-Notification Auction Sales Is Legally Unsustainable:  Supreme Court Slashes Exaggerated Land Value in Outer Ring Road Acquisition Case Limitation Cannot Defeat Joinder of Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC: Gujarat High Court Upholds Addition of Co-Plaintiffs in Ongoing Civil Suit Award Passed by Lok Adalat Cannot Be Challenged Before Civil Court Even on Grounds of Fraud: Bombay High Court Quashes Application Seeking Annulment of Settlement Comparability Must Be Proven — Proximity Alone Not Enough for Land Valuation: Orissa High Court Rejects Enhancement Claim in Land Acquisition Appeal Section 37 NDPS Cannot Override Article 21 Forever – Pre-Trial Custody Cannot Be Endless: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in 90kg Poppy Husk Case If Title Is Prima Facie, Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed Lies in Civil Court: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Widow’s Challenge to Alleged Fraudulent Transfer Tenant Remains a Tenant—Cannot Claim Ownership or Deny Eviction After Lease Ends: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Over Shop Possession Disrobing a Minor Is Aggravated Sexual Assault Even Without Penetration: Calcutta High Court Affirms Conviction Under Section 354B IPC and Section 10 POCSO Right to Property Remains a Constitutional Right – Even Drug Law Must Respect Due Process: Telangana High Court Upholds Freezing Order Under NDPS Act Criminal Law Cannot Be Weaponised for Breach of Contract: Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Property Deal Dispute High Court Cannot Reopen a Final Criminal Judgment Under Guise of Correction: Supreme Court Quashes ‘Clerical Revision’ That Diluted Murder Conviction

Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release of Surplus Water to Tackle Delhi’s Acute Water Crisis

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


“The urgency of the situation necessitates immediate action,” says Supreme Court in a directive to Himachal Pradesh and Haryana

New Delhi, June 2024 — In a decisive move to address the acute water crisis faced by Delhi amidst a severe heatwave, the Supreme Court has directed the State of Himachal Pradesh to release 137 cusecs of surplus drinking water from the Hathnikund Barrage. The court has also ordered the State of Haryana to facilitate the uninterrupted flow of this water to the Wazirabad Barrage in Delhi.

The Supreme Court, comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and K.V. Viswanathan, emphasized the critical need for immediate action in light of the extraordinary heatwave conditions exacerbating Delhi’s water scarcity. The court’s directive follows a detailed discussion held by the Upper Yamuna River Board (UYRB) on June 5, 2024, which was convened to address the urgent water needs of Delhi.

The court noted the severe impact of the heatwave on Delhi’s water supply and the compelling evidence presented by the Delhi government. “The acute shortage of drinking water due to the ongoing heatwave condition is undisputed,” the bench remarked, highlighting the dire situation faced by Delhi residents.

The court’s decision was grounded in humanitarian considerations and the necessity to protect the fundamental right to water. “The extraordinary circumstances warrant an extraordinary remedy,” Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra stated. The bench underscored the importance of inter-state cooperation in mitigating the crisis, urging Haryana to facilitate the flow of surplus water from Himachal Pradesh to Delhi.

“The urgency of the situation necessitates immediate action,” the court observed, directing Himachal Pradesh to release the surplus water by June 7, 2024, with prior intimation to Haryana. The judgment further detailed specific measures to ensure the efficient use of the released water, including separating commercial and domestic water supply and improving water distribution efficiency.

The Government of NCT of Delhi filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, seeking directives for the release of surplus drinking water from the Hathnikund Barrage. The petition highlighted the acute shortage of water in Delhi due to an unprecedented heatwave. The Supreme Court had previously instructed the UYRB to convene an urgent meeting to address the issue, resulting in the recommendations that formed the basis of the court’s order.

The Supreme Court’s order is expected to provide immediate relief to Delhi’s residents, who are grappling with severe water shortages. By ensuring the release and efficient use of surplus water, the judgment sets a precedent for inter-state cooperation in addressing environmental and humanitarian crises.

“This landmark decision underscores the judiciary’s role in safeguarding the fundamental rights of citizens, particularly in times of crisis,” commented Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate representing the petitioner. The judgment is anticipated to influence future water-sharing agreements and crisis management strategies across states.

The court has scheduled the next hearing for June 10, 2024, to review the compliance of its directives and ensure the effective implementation of the measures recommended by the UYRB.

Date of Order: June 6, 2024

Government of NCT of Delhi vs. State of Haryana & Ors.

Latest News