Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Supreme Court Directs Rehabilitation or Compensation for Longstanding Occupants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the rights of citizens over their longstanding occupied properties, the Supreme Court today mandated the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to “consider the claim of the appellants in terms of the Town Planning Scheme either for rehabilitation or payment of compensation.”

The apex court’s decision comes in the wake of a protracted legal battle that began in 2001, concerning the rights of the appellants who have been in possession of their property since 1976. The property, which has been a subject of multiple legal notices and suits, is now due for rehabilitation or compensation as per the provisions of the Town Planning Scheme.

The bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Rajesh Bindal, overturned the High Court’s decision that had ruled against the appellants. The Supreme Court observed that the claim of the appellants is genuine and deserves consideration, noting, “admittedly, the appellants were found to be in possession of the property in dispute from the year 1976 onwards.”

The Court has set a deadline for the Corporation to resolve the matter, ordering that “the needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.”

This judgment is poised to set a precedent for similar cases where occupants’ rights to rehabilitation or compensation are in contention, especially in the context of urban development and town planning schemes.

Date of Decision: 06 November 2023.

JAFFAR ALI NAWAB ALI  CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS VS THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI       

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/06-Nov-2023-Jaffar-Ali-Vs-MC-Greater-Mumbai.pdf"]

Latest Legal News