TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Directs Rehabilitation or Compensation for Longstanding Occupants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the rights of citizens over their longstanding occupied properties, the Supreme Court today mandated the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to “consider the claim of the appellants in terms of the Town Planning Scheme either for rehabilitation or payment of compensation.”

The apex court’s decision comes in the wake of a protracted legal battle that began in 2001, concerning the rights of the appellants who have been in possession of their property since 1976. The property, which has been a subject of multiple legal notices and suits, is now due for rehabilitation or compensation as per the provisions of the Town Planning Scheme.

The bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Rajesh Bindal, overturned the High Court’s decision that had ruled against the appellants. The Supreme Court observed that the claim of the appellants is genuine and deserves consideration, noting, “admittedly, the appellants were found to be in possession of the property in dispute from the year 1976 onwards.”

The Court has set a deadline for the Corporation to resolve the matter, ordering that “the needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.”

This judgment is poised to set a precedent for similar cases where occupants’ rights to rehabilitation or compensation are in contention, especially in the context of urban development and town planning schemes.

Date of Decision: 06 November 2023.

JAFFAR ALI NAWAB ALI  CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS VS THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI       

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/06-Nov-2023-Jaffar-Ali-Vs-MC-Greater-Mumbai.pdf"]

Latest Legal News