Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Clarifies Order, Allows CBI Investigation into Fraud Allegations against IRB Expressway Private Limited

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India clarified its previous order and granted permission for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigation into allegations of massive fraud by IRB Expressway Private Limited. The court allowed an Intervention Application seeking clarification of the order passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1256 of 2022, filed by Edapaddi Palaniswami. The applicant had expressed concerns that the previous order might hinder the desired CBI investigation into the alleged fraud. However, the court clarified that the order had no bearing on the applicant's complaint and granted permission for the investigation to proceed.

The applicant alleged that IRB Expressway Private Limited, in connivance with officials from the State of Maharashtra, had fraudulently obtained relief of approximately Rs. 70 crores by falsely claiming exemption due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The applicant had issued a notice to IRB, which denied the allegations and provided explanations along with supporting correspondence. The court examined the applicant's contentions and noted that reduction in payment of premium by IRB was allowed by the authorities due to the complete closure of toll plazas, including the one in question, following the government's orders during the pandemic. The court observed, "Complaint to be considered on its own merits... the judgment and order dated 03.08.2022... will have no bearing on the same."

Furthermore, the court emphasized that the applicant had no locus standi to seek clarification or modification of an order passed in an unrelated matter. Dismissing the application, the court stated, "The application is totally misconceived."

The judgment brings relief to the applicant and allows for a thorough investigation into the allegations of fraud. It reaffirms the court's commitment to ensuring that complaints are considered on their own merits and that relevant orders are not misinterpreted or misapplied. The CBI investigation will shed light on the allegations made against IRB Expressway Private Limited and any potential collusion with government officials, thus upholding the principles of justice and accountability.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

EDAPADDI PALANISWAMI  VS R.S.BHARATHI & ANR.

Latest Legal News