Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Order, Allows CBI Investigation into Fraud Allegations against IRB Expressway Private Limited

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India clarified its previous order and granted permission for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigation into allegations of massive fraud by IRB Expressway Private Limited. The court allowed an Intervention Application seeking clarification of the order passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1256 of 2022, filed by Edapaddi Palaniswami. The applicant had expressed concerns that the previous order might hinder the desired CBI investigation into the alleged fraud. However, the court clarified that the order had no bearing on the applicant's complaint and granted permission for the investigation to proceed.

The applicant alleged that IRB Expressway Private Limited, in connivance with officials from the State of Maharashtra, had fraudulently obtained relief of approximately Rs. 70 crores by falsely claiming exemption due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The applicant had issued a notice to IRB, which denied the allegations and provided explanations along with supporting correspondence. The court examined the applicant's contentions and noted that reduction in payment of premium by IRB was allowed by the authorities due to the complete closure of toll plazas, including the one in question, following the government's orders during the pandemic. The court observed, "Complaint to be considered on its own merits... the judgment and order dated 03.08.2022... will have no bearing on the same."

Furthermore, the court emphasized that the applicant had no locus standi to seek clarification or modification of an order passed in an unrelated matter. Dismissing the application, the court stated, "The application is totally misconceived."

The judgment brings relief to the applicant and allows for a thorough investigation into the allegations of fraud. It reaffirms the court's commitment to ensuring that complaints are considered on their own merits and that relevant orders are not misinterpreted or misapplied. The CBI investigation will shed light on the allegations made against IRB Expressway Private Limited and any potential collusion with government officials, thus upholding the principles of justice and accountability.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

EDAPADDI PALANISWAMI  VS R.S.BHARATHI & ANR.

Latest Legal News