Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Allows Prosecution of Police Personnel in Assault Case, Rejects Quashing of Charges

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the Supreme Court of India upheld the prosecution of police personnel accused of assault in a case involving unauthorized entry, abuse, and physical assault. The apex court rejected the quashing of charges sought by the accused police personnel, thereby clearing the path for further legal proceedings.

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Dr. S.M. Mansoori, represented by his legal heir, against Surekha Parmar and others. The complaint alleged that Surekha Parmar, an Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) at the Mahila Police Station in Jabalpur, along with fellow officers, forcefully entered Dr. Mansoori's residence and subjected him and his family members to physical abuse and verbal harassment.

The High Court had previously quashed the charges against the accused police personnel, citing the absence of sanction under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.). However, the Supreme Court opined that it was premature to conclude whether the acts alleged were performed within the scope of official duty. The requirement for sanction, according to the Court, should be determined after the evidence is recorded.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court emphasized that at this stage, the allegations raised serious concerns and warranted further investigation. The Court's decision has effectively reinstated the charges against the police personnel and permitted the continuation of legal proceedings.

The verdict delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal marks an important step in upholding accountability and ensuring that public servants are held responsible for their actions. The ruling also clarifies that the absence of sanction under Section 197 of the Cr.P.C. should not impede the prosecution process when the allegations raise doubts about the performance of official duties.

The case will now proceed before the appropriate court, where evidence will be examined, and a final decision on the issue of sanction will be made. The judgment serves as a reminder that the law will not shield those accused of misconduct, irrespective of their official positions, and underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding justice and the rule of law.

Date of Judgment: April 12, 2023

S.M. MANSOORI (DEAD) THR. L.R. vs SUREKHA PARMAR & ORS. 

Latest Legal News