Board Consultation Mandatory Before Withholding Pension Of Retired Employee Under General Insurance Pension Scheme: Delhi High Court Simultaneous Pursuit Of Two Qualifications Not A Ground For Termination In Absence Of Statutory Bar: Allahabad High Court Trade Marks Act Makes No Distinction Between House Marks And Trade Marks: Bombay High Court Limitation For Recovery Of Earnest Money Reckoned From Date Of Contract Repudiation, Not Execution Of Agreement: Delhi High Court State Electricity Commissions Must Treat Ministry’s RPO Capping Directives As Material Factors; Cannot Ignore Guidance: Andhra Pradesh High Court Direction To Deposit Rents Cannot Be Sought In Title Suit If Not Prayed For In Main Relief, Especially After 5-Year Delay: Andhra Pradesh High Court Charity Commissioner Has Power To Appoint Interim Committee & Stay Elections If Management Functions Beyond Tenure: Bombay High Court Rape Case Quashed As Complainant Voluntarily Accompanied Accused To Hotel & Refused Medical Exam: Calcutta High Court Plaintiffs Cannot Create Illusory Cause Of Action Through Clever Drafting To Save Time-Barred Suits: Karnataka High Court Surcharge Proceedings Under AP Cooperative Societies Act Not Applicable To District Bank Employees For Lapses In Primary Societies: Andhra Pradesh High Court No Compensation If Land Acquisition Proceedings Are Abandoned & Property Excluded From Final Notification: Karnataka High Court Law Is Above You, No Matter How High: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Illegal Tourism Hub In Visakhapatnam CRZ NDPS Act | Karnataka High Court Grants Bail On Ground Of Parity To Accused Found With Lesser Quantity Than Co-Accused Section 138 NI Act Offence Can Be Compounded Even After Conviction; High Court Has Discretion To Waive Costs In Exceptional Cases: Punjab & Haryana HC NEET (UG) 2026: Karnataka High Court Refuses To Reopen Payment Portal For Candidate Who Waited Till Last Date To Pay Fees Importers Can't Escape Penalties For Using False Documents Merely By Opting For Re-Export: Madras High Court Long Incarceration No Ground For Bail In Crimes That Shock Collective Conscience: Punjab & Haryana HC Refuses Bail To Shubam Sangra In Kathua Case

Supreme Court Affirms Taxation of Maize Starch, Dismisses Appeals Seeking Exemption

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the taxation of maize starch and dismissed the appeals filed by Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited, seeking exemption. The bench, comprising Hon'ble Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Justice Dipankar Datta, declared on July 4, 2023, "Maize starch falls under the taxation entry for 'sago and starch of any kind,' subject to a 4% tax rate."

The case centered on the classification and taxation of maize starch under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The appellant, Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited, argued for exemption based on an Exemption Notification issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu. However, subsequent amendments to the Act altered the entry for maize starch, making it subject to a 4% tax rate.

Represented by Mr. K.K. Mani, the appellant contended that Exemption Entry No. 8, covering products of millets, encompassed maize starch. The appellant relied on previous circulars issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to support their claim. Mr. C. Kranthi Kumar, representing the respondents, asserted that maize starch should be taxed under the broader category of 'sago and starch of any kind.'

The Supreme Court, after careful analysis of the provisions and amendments, concurred with the High Court's judgment. They stated, "Taxation Entry No. 61 encompasses maize starch under the category of 'sago and starch of any kind,' attracting a 4% tax rate." The Court emphasized that Exemption Entry No. 8 specifically applied to products of millets and did not extend to maize starch due to its status as a processed product.

Rejecting the appellant's argument regarding the retrospective effect of the Commissioner's clarification, the Court declared, "Clarifications issued by the Commissioner can have retrospective application to make the rate of tax explicit."

Consequently, the Supreme Court found no merit in the appeals and upheld the taxation of maize starch. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.

DATE OF DECISION: July 4, 2023

Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited vs The State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.   

Latest Legal News