Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

SUPREME COURT AFFIRMS ACQUITTAL IN MURDER CASE – FAILURE TO ESTABLISH A COMPLETE CHAIN OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the acquittal of the accused in a criminal appeal in a murder case that garnered widespread attention. The case, titled Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) v. Shyam Bihari & Others, involved the Central Bureau of Investigation appealing against the judgment and order of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital.

The Supreme Court bench, headed by Justice Manoj Misra, rendered its decision on July 17, 2023. The appeal sought to overturn the acquittal of the accused by the trial court in a case related to the killing of Raj Kumar Baliyan in 1987.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court cited insufficient evidence and a failure to establish a complete chain of circumstances to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Justice Manoj Misra stated in the judgment, “The ocular accounts of the witnesses failed to positively identify the accused as the perpetrators. The recovery of empty cartridges from the crime scene raised doubts about the involvement of other persons and the exact circumstances of the incident.”

The Court further emphasized that the cause of death was determined to be a gunshot from a .12 bore weapon, which contradicted the use of service rifles by the accused. As a result, the Court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish a direct link between the accused and the cause of death.

Justice Manoj Misra further remarked, “The circumstances found proved do not constitute a chain so far complete as to indicate that it was the accused persons and no one else who committed the crime. In such a situation, the trial court was justified in extending the benefit of doubt to the accused.”

The Supreme Court’s decision affirms the High Court’s earlier ruling, dismissing the Government Appeal filed by the CBI. The judgment highlights the importance of a complete and robust evidentiary chain in criminal cases, ensuring guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

The case has drawn significant attention from legal experts and the public alike, shedding light on the complexities involved in criminal proceedings and the burden of proof placed on the prosecution.

DATE OF DECISION: July 17, 2023

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION vs SHYAM BIHARI & OTHERS     

Latest Legal News