Law of Limitation Must Be Applied Strictly; Mere Negligence or Inaction Cannot Justify Delay: Punjab & Haryana High Court Discharge from Service for Non-Disclosure of Criminal Case Held Arbitrary, Reinstatement Ordered: Calcutta High Court Maintenance for Children Restored from Date of Petition, Residence Order Limited to Pre-Divorce Period: Kerala High Court Shared Resources Must Be Preserved: P&H HC Validates Co-Owner's Right to Irrigation Access Position of Authority Misused by Lecturer to Exploit Student: Orissa High Court Rejects Bail to Lecturer in Sexual Assault Case Temporary Disconnection Of Water Supply Without Unlawful Or Dishonest Intent Does Not Constitute ‘Mischief’: Kerala High Court Quashed Criminal Proceedings Adult Sons' Student Loans Not a Valid Ground to Avoid Alimony: Calcutta High Court Ancestral Property Requires Proof of Unbroken Succession: Punjab & Haryana HC Rejects Coparcenary Claim Grant of Land for Public Purpose Does Not Divest Ownership Rights: Bombay High Court on Shri Ganpati Panchayat Sansthan's Reversionary Rights Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Against Government Directive on Proving Experience of Deputy District Attorneys Orissa High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Insurer’s Appeal Partly Allowed Service Law – Promotion Criteria Cannot Be Imposed Beyond Recruitment Rules: Supreme Court Access To Clean And Hygienic Toilets Is Not Just A Matter Of Convenience But A Fundamental Right Under Article 21: Supreme Court Promotions Under Merit-Cum-Seniority Quota Cannot Be Based Solely on Comparative Merit: Supreme Court Reliefs Must Be Both Available and Enforceable at the Time of Filing to Attract Order II Rule 2 Bar: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications

Sexually Assaulting Five Minor Girls Evidence of Each Of The Victim Girls Inspires Confidence: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment

15 September 2024 3:56 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


In recent judgement, the Bombay High Court delivered a significant judgment in the case of Ramesh Krishna Gopnur vs. State of Maharashtra, affirming the conviction and life imprisonment sentence of Ramesh Krishna Gopnur for sexually assaulting five minor girls over two years. The court underscored the credibility of the victims' testimonies and the corroborating medical evidence, setting a crucial precedent for cases under the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Ramesh Krishna Gopnur, an agriculturist and resident of Vasai, Thane, was accused of sexually assaulting five girls aged between 8 to 13 years from the same village. The assaults went on for approximately two years before being discovered. Following an eyewitness account by PW6, the complainant (PW7) lodged an FIR against Gopnur, leading to his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai Thane, on March 29, 2014. He was sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 376(f) of the Indian Penal Code and rigorous imprisonment under the POCSO Act.

The primary legal questions involved offenses under Section 376(f) and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, alongside Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The defense argued false implication due to a family dispute and questioned the delay in reporting the assaults. However, the prosecution presented testimonies from the victims and medical evidence, arguing that the delay did not diminish the credibility of the victims.

The High Court meticulously reviewed the evidence, including testimonies from the five survivors (PW1-PW5) and the eyewitness (PW6). Each victim detailed the assaults, describing how Gopnur would lure them to isolated places, sexually assault them, and threaten them into silence. The court noted the consistency in the victims' accounts and the lack of any challenge to their ages or medical evidence in cross-examination.

Medical examination reports confirmed signs of sexual assault on the victims, with hymenal tears and indications of chronic vaginal penetration. The court found the testimonies credible and corroborated by medical findings, stating that "the evidence of each of the victim girls inspires confidence."

Furthermore, the court held that Gopnur failed to rebut the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, which shifts the burden of proof onto the accused in sexual offense cases involving minors.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding Gopnur's conviction and the sentence imposed by the trial court. This judgment reinforces the legal framework for the protection of children under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the importance of the victims' testimony and medical evidence in sexual assault cases.

Date of Decision:  September 11, 2024

Ramesh Krishna Gopnur vs The State of Maharashtra

Similar News