Unregistered Agreement Of Sale Entered Before Attachment Cannot Defeat Decree-Holder’s Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court No Presumption That Joint Family Possesses Joint Property; Female Hindu Absolute Owner Of Property Purchased In Her Name: Allahabad High Court Age Determination Must Strictly Follow Hierarchy Of Documents Under JJ Act: Orissa High Court Acquits Man Of POCSO Charges Once 'C' Form Declarations Are Signed, Burden Shifts To Buyer To Prove Payment Of Outstanding Dues: Madras High Court Section 213 Succession Act No Bar To Eviction Suit If Claim Is Based On Landlord-Tenant Relationship, Not Title Under Will: Bombay High Court Meritorious Candidate Wrongfully Denied Appointment Entitled To Notional Seniority & Old Pension Scheme: J&K & Ladakh High Court 6-Year Delay In Propounding Will & Hostile Attesting Witness Constitute 'Grave Suspicious Circumstances': Delhi High Court Refuses Probate Section 319 CrPC Power Cannot Be Exercised Based On FIR Or Section 161 Statements: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Of Unmarried Sisters Bail Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Recovery Proceedings; Court Can't Order Sale Of Accused's Property: Supreme Court Able-Bodied Husband Cannot Defeat Maintenance Claim By Projecting Income Below Minimum Wages: Delhi High Court Recording Section 313 CrPC Statement Before Cross-Examination Of Prosecution Witness Does Not Vitiate Trial: Karnataka High Court Murder By Unknown Assailants Is Not 'Accidental Death' Under Mukhymantri Kisan Bima Yojna: Allahabad High Court Section 311 CrPC | Court Not A Passive Bystander, Must Summon Material Witness If Essential For Just Decision: Rajasthan High Court

Seeking Direction to Create Special Bench of SC in Every HC – Kerala HC Court Dismisses Plea

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Recently, the Kerala High Court rejected a petition requesting the establishment of a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court in all High Courts to hear cases involving the destitute and the poor.

According to Chief Justice S Manikumar and Shaji P Chaly, they were not inclined to grant the requested reliefs because the petitioner had made serious allegations against the judiciary.

In his petition, the petitioner alleged that in his case, the judges were in cahoots with criminals and were able to secure positions after retirement.

The petitioner also requested that the court instruct the Centre to raise the retirement age of High Court and Supreme Court judges to 75 years and to prohibit all judicial officers from accepting government positions after retirement.

According to the petitioner who appeared as a party-in-person, if these steps are taken, it will be possible to ensure that the judiciary is not influenced, thereby restoring people's faith in the Indian Judiciary.

Nonetheless, after hearing the arguments, the bench remained unconvinced and proceeded to reject the present appeal.

D.D: 21 JUNE 2022

 

ABDUL JALEEL Versus Cabinet Principal Secretary & Ors

Latest Legal News